Great one-liners from PF members

  • Thread starter Thread starter sysprog
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Members
Click For Summary
The discussion centers around sharing and appreciating humorous and witty one-liners from the Physics Forums. Participants highlight various clever remarks, often related to physics, science, and the absurdities of homeopathy. Notable contributions include quips about relativity, the limitations of crayons, and humorous takes on homeopathic remedies. The thread also touches on the nature of scientific discourse, emphasizing that interesting questions often arise amid conflicting ideas. Additionally, there are playful exchanges about the nuances of communication, humor in technical discussions, and the importance of clarity in scientific explanations. Overall, the thread celebrates the blend of humor and intellect found within scientific discussions.
  • #511
hmmm27 said:
I haven't read The Hobbit either, though I imagine it's a comparitively easy read.
I was exposed to "The Hobbit" in year 9 high school English class. It was one of the prescribed literature textbooks, but our teacher refused to teach anything about it. She thought it was nonsense -- far beneath her. (Tbh, I didn't like her much at all. A literature teacher who doesn't comprehend the achievements of J.R.R. Tolkien?? Sheesh.)

"The Hobbit" is interesting in that the writing starts off with a rather childish tone -- well below year 9, I'd have thought. Not to mention the silly poems/songs.

Then the tone soon becomes more mature as the chapters advance.
 
  • Like
Likes hmmm27 and Borg
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #512
I took a speed reading class and then was able to read War and Peace in twenty minutes.

It's about Russia.

That was Woody Allen.
 
  • #513
I'm not sure if I'm allowed to self-report, but this is from a PM discussion with a couple members after they wasted a fair amount of time and effort trying to help a user in the EE forum who mainly seemed clueless about their AC Mains project they kept asking about, but turned out to have ulterior motives...

berkeman said:
Yeah, very sorry about that, what a waste of our time and effort. He was a help vampire and hacker hidden in clueless sheep's clothing. (That might be a record for mixing metaphors...) :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes Klystron, Bystander and Vanadium 50
  • #514
Hacker hidden in clueless sheep's clothing? Maybe he's just not the sharpest cookie in the jar.
 
  • #515
Vanadium 50 said:
Hacker hidden in clueless sheep's clothing? Maybe he's just not the sharpest cookie in the jar.
Doh! :smile:
 
  • #516
Link limited to a select group !

1689181800082.png

1689181842828.png
 
  • #517
BvU said:
Link limited to a select group !
Yes, it's from a PM conversation. :smile:
 
  • #518
Or...you can lead a gift horse to water but you can't look in his mouth.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes Klystron, BillTre and jbriggs444
  • #519
I always thought the gifted horses were the ones stomping out answers to arithmetic questions...
 
  • #520
gmax137 said:
I always thought the gifted horses were the ones stomping out answers to arithmetic questions...
They could also just be horses given to someone.
 
  • #521
gmax137 said:
I always thought the gifted horses were the ones stomping out answers to arithmetic questions...
HorseGPT.
 
  • #522
Vanadium 50 said:
HorseGPT.
ChatGPY and horses have one thing in common, at least: they both produce a lot of hotses.h...er...manure.
 
  • #523
Vanadium 50 said:
HorseGPT.
That could be a winner. People like animals. Could CatGPT lie ahead?

I kind of like the idea of ChatLSD but that might get old fast. Then again, maybe not.
 
  • #524
CatGPT would just ignore your questions.

Edit: This got me to thinking about Googling it and it turns out that CatGPT exists - https://cat-gpt.com
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes mathwonk, PeterDonis and dextercioby
  • #525
Hornbein said:
Could CatGPT lie ahead?
We already have it in French. :-p
 
  • #526
jack action said:
We already have it in French. :-p
Well dang. I've had this happen before. Last time it was Apocalypso. Someday soon anything you can imagine will already be there. Then what?

A ChatLSD search turned up the Charles Schwab brokerage. Who knew?

There was a ChatLSD on Instagram that has been removed.
 
Last edited:
  • #527
Hornbein said:
Who knew?
Timothy Leary?
 
  • #528
PeroK said:
This process of continually updating one's knowledge of a subject is called learning. It's the opposite of religiously adhering to an established view in the face of evidence to the contrary.
 
  • Like
Likes Flyboy, berkeman, Hornbein and 3 others
  • #529
pbuk said:
... if only there were some way of searching for information on the internet :wink:
This deserves to be in this thread in its own right, yeah?
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman, phinds, BillTre and 1 other person
  • #530
PeroK said
This process of continually updating one's knowledge of a subject is called learning. It's the opposite of religiously adhering to an established view in the face of evidence to the contrary.
I might borrow this one, if you don't mind.

-Dan
 
  • #531
Swamp Thing said:
This deserves to be in this thread in its own right, yeah?
That was my complaint about the title "Breaking bad."
 
  • #532
  • Like
Likes jack action
  • #533
In a discussion about a woman who had 69 children from 27 pregnancies (all multiple births):
BillTre said:
27 x .75 = 20.25 years
That so much more reasonable.
Very fertile, but also efficient.
 
  • #534
About questionable results in a new paper:

Vanadium 50 said:
At least it puts the woo in woo hoo.

:smile:
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes Tom.G, BillTre and topsquark
  • #535
When trying to help an EE student with analyzing fairly simple circuits, and they keep trying to use SPICE to guide their learning...

DaveE said:
You'll learn a lot more about electronics if you solve simple circuits with math before you simulate them. Simulations only give you answers, not reasons.
 
  • Like
  • Care
Likes Wrichik Basu and BillTre
  • #536
russ_watters said:
As a rule of thumb, when the first thing someone tells you is that their invention isn't a perpetual motion machine (before you can even think to ask), that means it's a perpetual motion machine.
 
  • Like
Likes Wrichik Basu, DennisN, Bystander and 5 others
  • #537
That sounds like a conversation that could go on forever.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes BillTre and berkeman
  • #538
gleem said:
There is no universal Least Action path to happiness.
 
  • Like
Likes Wrichik Basu, Vanadium 50, berkeman and 1 other person
  • #539
This one is way over my head... :smile:

Vanadium 50 said:
The fact that you can buy an oven mitt at all is proof of quantum mechanics.
 
  • #540
There is an explanation in that thread.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
14K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 141 ·
5
Replies
141
Views
15K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
39
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K