Green function in electrostatics

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of Green's functions in solving Dirichlet problems in electrostatics. Specifically, it addresses the integral equation for potential Φ(x) involving Green's function G(x,x') and the significance of the partial derivative of G in the surface integral. The participants clarify that the surface integral accounts for the contribution of surface charge distributions induced by point charges, which is essential for satisfying boundary conditions. The mathematical derivation is rooted in Gauss's theorem, linking volume and surface integrals in electrostatic contexts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Green's functions in mathematical physics
  • Familiarity with electrostatics and potential theory
  • Knowledge of Gauss's theorem and its applications
  • Ability to perform vector calculus, including partial derivatives
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and properties of Green's functions in electrostatics
  • Explore the implications of boundary conditions in potential theory
  • Learn about the physical interpretation of surface charge distributions
  • Investigate applications of Green's functions in solving partial differential equations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on electrostatics, mathematical physics, and applied mathematics, will benefit from this discussion.

Lior Fa
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I'm taking a course in electrostatics and electrodynamics.

We learned about finding a potentional using unique Green functions that are dependent of the geometry of the problem. Specificly on a Dirichlet problem we get the solution:

Φ(x)=∫ρ(x')G(x,x')d3x' - (1/4π)*∫Φ(x')*(∂G(x,x')/∂n')da'


I understand the idea of the Green function, but don't understand why on the second integral (surface integral) there is a use of the partial deriviative of G. Can anyone give me some intuition about it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The idea of the Green's function is based on Green's integral theorem, which is an application of Gauss's theorem,
$$\int_{V} \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{x}' \vec{\nabla}' \cdot \vec{A}(\vec{x}')=\int_{\partial V} \mathrm{d}^2 \vec{f} \cdot \vec{A}(\vec{x}'),$$
where ##V## is some volume and ##\partial V## its boundary surface. The orientation of the surface-normal vectors is out of the volume.

Now set
$$\vec{A}(\vec{x}')=G(\vec{x},\vec{x}') \vec{\nabla}' \Phi(\vec{x}')-\Phi(\vec{x}')\vec{\nabla}' G(\vec{x},\vec{x}')$$
Then
$$\vec{\nabla}' \cdot \vec{A}(\vec{x}')=G(\vec{x},\vec{x}') \Delta' \Phi(\vec{x}') - \Phi(\vec{x}') \Delta' G(\vec{x},\vec{x}').$$
If the Green's function now satisfies
$$\Delta' G(\vec{x},\vec{x}')=-4 \pi \delta^{(3)}(\vec{x}-\vec{x}')$$
and if ##\Phi## fulfills (Gauss units)
$$\Delta' \Phi(\vec{x}')=-4 \pi \rho(\vec{x}')$$
you have
$$\vec{\nabla}' \cdot \vec{A}(\vec{x}')=-4 \pi G(\vec{x},\vec{x}') \rho(\vec{x}') + 4 \pi \Phi(\vec{x}') \delta^{(3)}(\vec{x},\vec{x}').$$
Now integrate this over the volume ##V##, you get for ##\vec{x} \in V##
$$\int_V \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{x}' \vec{\nabla}' \cdot \vec{A}(\vec{x}') = -4 \pi \int_V \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{x}' G(\vec{x},\vec{x}') \rho(\vec{x}')+4 \pi \Phi(\vec{x}).$$
According to Gauss's Law, this equals the surface integral
$$-4 \pi \int_V \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{x}' G(\vec{x},\vec{x}') \rho(\vec{x}')+4 \pi \Phi(\vec{x})=\int_{\partial V} \mathrm{d}^2 \vec{f}' \cdot \vec{A}(\vec{x}') = \int_{\partial V} \mathrm{d}^2 \vec{f}' \cdot [G(\vec{x},\vec{x}') \vec{\nabla}' \Phi(\vec{x}')-\Phi(\vec{x}')\vec{\nabla}' G(\vec{x},\vec{x}')].$$
By definition the Dirichlet problem means that you know ##\Phi(\vec{x}')## for ##\vec{x}' \in \partial V## but nothing about derivatives of ##\Phi## along the surface. Thus you define the Green's function such that it has to fulfill the boundary condition
$$G(\vec{x},\vec{x}')|_{\vec{x}' \in \partial V}=0,$$
then you get
$$4 \pi \Phi(\vec{x})=4 \pi \int_V \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{x}' G(\vec{x},\vec{x}') \rho(\vec{x}')-\int_{\partial V} \mathrm{d}^2 \vec{f}' \cdot \Phi(\vec{x}') \vec{\nabla}' G(\vec{x},\vec{x}').$$
Since further ##\mathrm{d}^2 \vec{f}' =\vec{n} \mathrm{d}^2 a##, dividing by ##4 \pi## gives your formula.
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby
vanhees71
thank you for the explenation.
I understand the mathematics of it and how to derive it.
What I don't understand is the physical intuition behind the derivietive of G on the surface integral.
G on the volume integral means (as far as I understood) summing up the impulse response of 1 charge at x, for all the volume V, witch makes good sense.
But the surface integral says: sum up the (known) potential product with the deriviative of G in direction of the normal to S. What is the physical meaning of this?
 
The Green's function, seen as a field ##\Phi(\vec{x})=G(\vec{x},\vec{x}')## is the solution for the situation that you have a point charge of charge ##q=1## in ##\vec{x}'## and a grounded conducting surface ##\partial V##, because it's 0 along this surface. Physically the charges within the conducting surface rearrange due to the presence of the unit charge at ##\vec{x}'## such as to fulfill this boundary condition, and thus in addition to this unit charge you have a surface charge distribution along the surface, and this surface charge distribution is given by the normal component of the electric field along the surface, but the field is the gradient of ##G##, and the contribution of this surface charge thus makes the term with the surface integral in Green's formula.
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby
Thread 'Colors in a plasma globe'
I have a common plasma globe with blue streamers and orange pads at both ends. The orange light is emitted by neon and the blue light is presumably emitted by argon and xenon. Why are the streamers blue while the pads at both ends are orange? A plasma globe's electric field is strong near the central electrode, decreasing with distance, so I would not expect the orange color at both ends.

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
19K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K