Green's function and density of states

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the derivation of the spectral density of states from the Green's function for a one-dimensional lattice chain, as presented in Mingo's work. The Green's function is given, and the user struggles to derive the spectral density of states, which is provided directly in the text. The user attempts to manipulate the Green's function using a substitution but encounters issues related to branch cuts in complex analysis. A suggestion is made to reconsider the treatment of the square root to properly account for the branch cut, indicating that the correct approach involves summing the two square roots instead of taking their difference. The conversation highlights the complexities involved in deriving spectral properties from Green's functions in condensed matter physics.
Karthiksrao
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
Dear all,

In his book chapter " Green’s Function Methods for Phonon Transport Through Nano-Contacts", Mingo arrives at the Green's function for the end atom of a one dimensional lattice chain (each atom modeled as a mass connected to neighbouring atoms through springs). He gives the green function as

## G = \frac{2}{\omega^2 + \sqrt{\omega^4 + 4 k \omega^2}} ##

From this the intention is to find the spectral density of states. He directly gives it as

## \rho = \frac{1}{2 \pi} \frac{\sqrt{\omega^4 + 4 k \omega^2}}{2 k \omega^2} ##.

I have not been able to show this.

Earlier in the chapter he uses the standard representation for the spectral density of states as
## G - G^* = 2 \pi \rho ##.

Using this I attempted the following way. Let ## \omega^2 = z ## (he had used such a representation earlier, hence I tried this), which gives:

## G(z) = \frac{2}{z + \sqrt{z^2 + 4 k z}} ##

which can also be written as:

## G(z) = \frac{ z - \sqrt{z^2 + 4 k z}}{- 2 k z} ##

Because of the ## \sqrt{z}## factor there is a branch cut along negative real axis. That's probably the only reason why ## G - G^*## would have a non-negative value - since there would be a non-zero difference in the values across the branch cut.

So what we need is :
## \lim_{\delta \rightarrow 0} G(z+ i \delta) - G(z - i \delta) ##

This gives:

## \rho = \lim_{\delta \rightarrow 0} \frac{1}{2 \pi} \left( \frac{ \sqrt{1 + \frac{4 k}{z+ i \delta}} - 1}{ 2 k } - \frac{ \sqrt{1 + \frac{4 k }{z - i \delta}} - 1}{ 2 k } \right) = \frac{1}{2 \pi} \left( \frac{ \sqrt{1 + \frac{4 k }{z+ i \delta}} - \sqrt{1 + \frac{4 k }{z - i \delta}}}{ 2 k } \right) ##

If you take the limit, this just goes to zero.

What am I doing wrong?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would have to take a closer look, but I think you have to write the square root as ##f(z)^{1/2}## and you have to continue it around the branch cut the square root whence it will pick up a factor -1. Summa summarum you will end up with the sum of the two square roots and not it's difference.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
763
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K