Greens functions from path integral

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on deriving the Green's function from the partition function using path integral formalism. The partition function is expressed as Z = Tr(exp(-βH)), and the Green's function is formulated as G(xx',τ-τ') = 1/ZTr[exp(-H(β-τ)cxexp(-H(τ-τ'))cx'exp(-Hτ')]. The main question is how to transition from the partition function to the Green's function using the provided path integral representation. Clarification is sought on the steps necessary to arrive at the specific equation referenced, indicating a need for a deeper understanding of the relationship between Z and G. The inquiry emphasizes the importance of the path integral approach in quantum statistical mechanics.
aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
Let me post this question again in a slightly modified form. On the attached picture the path integral for the partion function: Z = Tr(exp(-βH))
Now according to what it says on the picture it should be easy from this to get the Green's function in the path integral formalism. The Green's function is given by:
G(xx',τ-τ') = 1/ZTr[exp(-H(β-τ)cxexp(-H(τ-τ'))cx'exp(-Hτ')]
But how exactly does this trivally allow us to apply the formula for the partion function path integral?
 

Attachments

  • greensfunction.png
    greensfunction.png
    77.7 KB · Views: 496
Physics news on Phys.org
aaaa202 said:
Let me post this question again in a slightly modified form. On the attached picture the path integral for the partion function: Z = Tr(exp(-βH))
Now according to what it says on the picture it should be easy from this to get the Green's function in the path integral formalism. The Green's function is given by:
G(xx',τ-τ') = 1/ZTr[exp(-H(β-τ)cxexp(-H(τ-τ'))cx'exp(-Hτ')]
But how exactly does this trivally allow us to apply the formula for the partion function path integral?

I'm not sure what you're asking. Are you asking how to get G from Z, or how to derive the path-integral expression for G?
 
I'm asking how you end up with the equation 2.7 given that we know the path integral representation of Z.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K