Green's theorem with a scalar function

Click For Summary
Green's Theorem is not considered a suitable method for computing circulation in the presence of a scalar function, as parameterizing the boundary into curves is deemed more straightforward. The discussion suggests evaluating the integral along three specific curves in a counterclockwise direction. Additionally, the clarity of the original post is criticized due to difficult handwriting, with a recommendation to use LaTeX for better readability. The conversation emphasizes the importance of clear communication in mathematical discussions. Overall, parameterization is favored over Green's Theorem for this problem.
Amaelle
Messages
309
Reaction score
54
Homework Statement
Look at the image
Relevant Equations
Green theorem
circuitation
Greetings!
My question is: is it possible to use the green theorem to compute the circulation while in presence of a scalar function ? I know how to solve by parametrising each part but just in case we can go faster? thank you!
1644760912541.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I might b
Amaelle said:
Homework Statement:: Look at the image
Relevant Equations:: Green theorem
circuitation

Greetings!
My question is: is it possible to use the green theorem to compute the circulation while in presence of a scalar function ? I know how to solve by parametrising each part but just in case we can go faster? thank you!
View attachment 297061
I could be wrong, but I don't believe that Green's Theorem is a reasonable approach here. It seems much more straightforward to parameterize the boundary into three curves, and then evaluate the integral of each.

Going counterclockwise along ##\gamma##, we have
1. ##x = t, y = t, 0 \le t \le 2##
2. ##x = 2\cos(t), y= 2\sin(t), \pi/4 \le t \le \pi/2##
3. ##x = 0, y = t, 2 \ge t \ge 0##

BTW, your handwriting is not the easiest to read, particularly your shorthand abbreviations. Everything you wrote in longhand could be done using LaTeX, which would make it easier for us to understand.

For example:
Ex. 2: Compute ##\int_\gamma xy ds## where ##\gamma## is the parameterization of the boundary of
##D = \{(x, y) : x^2 + y^2 \le 2, x \ge 0, y \ge 0, y \ge x\}##
 
Mark44 said:
I might b

I could be wrong, but I don't believe that Green's Theorem is a reasonable approach here. It seems much more straightforward to parameterize the boundary into three curves, and then evaluate the integral of each.

Going counterclockwise along ##\gamma##, we have
1. ##x = t, y = t, 0 \le t \le 2##
2. ##x = 2\cos(t), y= 2\sin(t), \pi/4 \le t \le \pi/2##
3. ##x = 0, y = t, 2 \ge t \ge 0##

BTW, your handwriting is not the easiest to read, particularly your shorthand abbreviations. Everything you wrote in longhand could be done using LaTeX, which would make it easier for us to understand.

For example:
Ex. 2: Compute ##\int_\gamma xy ds## where ##\gamma## is the parameterization of the boundary of
##D = \{(x, y) : x^2 + y^2 \le 2, x \ge 0, y \ge 0, y \ge x\}##
Thank you so much!
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
942
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K