Griffiths QM 1st vs 2nd editions

  • Thread starter Thread starter jtbell
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Griffiths Qm
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on the differences between the first and second editions of Griffiths's "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics," particularly in the context of their suitability for a junior/senior level undergraduate course. Participants explore various changes made in the second edition, including content adjustments and pedagogical enhancements.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant mentions considering the use of the second edition for a course and expresses uncertainty about the differences between the two editions.
  • Another participant notes that the preface of the second edition outlines several changes, including a completely rewritten Chapter 3, streamlined treatments for better comprehension, and the addition of new problems and examples.
  • A later reply highlights specific changes mentioned in the preface, such as the relocation of background material to the Appendix and improvements in the presentation of angular momentum and the adiabatic theorem.
  • One participant suggests that Chapter 3 has been shortened, indicating a focus on linear algebra.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the second edition contains significant revisions, particularly in Chapter 3, but there is no consensus on the extent or impact of these changes. Some details remain contested or unclear.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include potential missing details on other chapters, the subjective nature of "cleaner and more accessible," and the implications of the added problems and examples on course structure.

jtbell
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
2025 Award
Messages
16,107
Reaction score
8,084
I have the first edition of Griffiths's "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" and am considering using it (or rather the second edition) for a junior/senior level undergraduate course next spring. What makes the second edition different? I should just get a copy, I know, but I'll probably have to buy it myself. The class is going to be so small that I doubt the publisher would want to give me a freebie.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have the second edition, but not the first. The preface in the second edition talks about the differences between the editions, but I don't have my book at home.

The publisher's website states that differences include

"Completely rewritten chapter on the formalism of quantum mechanics — Chapter 3.

Streamlines the treatment for more effective instructor presentation and student comprehension.

Many added problems and worked examples.

Introduces students to computer-based material using Mathematica.

75 new problems and 12 new worked examples."
 
From the preface to the second edition:

David J. Griffiths said:
In preparing the second edition I have tried to retain as much as possible the spirit of the first. The only wholesale change is Chapter 3, which was much too long and diverting; it has been completely rewritten, with the background material on finite-dimensional vector spaces (a subject with which most students at this level are already comfortable) relegated to the Appendix. I have added some examples in Chapter 2 (and fixed the awkward definition of raising and lowering operators fro the harmonic oscillator). In later chapters I have made as few changes as I could, even preserving the numbering of problems and equations, where possible. The treatment is streamlined in places (a better introduction to angular momentum in Chapter 4, for instance, a simpler proof of the adiabatic theorem in Chapter 10, and a new section on partial wave phase shifts in Chapter 11). Inevitably, the second edition is a bit longer than the first, which I regret, but I hope it is cleaner and more accessible.
 
I think they shortened the 3rd chapter on linear algebra by a bit.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K