GTR & STR: Could 9 Dimensions Unify Theory?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter eaglechief
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Manifold
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the possibility of General Relativity (GTR) and Special Relativity (STR) being embedded in a higher-dimensional framework, specifically considering the implications of a hypothetical physical reality containing nine dimensions. Participants examine whether GTR and STR can adequately describe such a reality and the mathematical foundations related to embedding theories.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that if physical reality contains nine dimensions, GTR and STR may be limited in their ability to describe the entire physical truth, which is traditionally framed in four dimensions.
  • Others mention that embedding theorems exist which allow lower-dimensional curved spaces to be embedded in higher-dimensional flat spaces, but these theorems do not make physical predictions.
  • A participant questions whether the focus on nine dimensions is significant or merely a random example, suggesting that the dimensionality might not be the core issue.
  • There is a query about whether the discussion pertains to mathematical embeddings or the actual dimensionality of spacetime as perceived in GTR.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the significance of nine dimensions and whether GTR and STR can be reconciled with a higher-dimensional framework. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing perspectives on the implications of higher dimensions for established theories.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the nature of physical reality and the implications of higher dimensions are not fully articulated, leaving open questions regarding the relationship between dimensionality and the applicability of GTR and STR.

eaglechief
Messages
26
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
I try to understand if the GTR could work together with theories, where physical reality contains more than 4d
Let's play pretend a progressive alien civilisation contacts us and an irrelevant conversation begins. Later on, an alien-scientist says: "by the way, the physical reality contains 9 dimensions. I heard a famous human theorist announced, that it should be 4. You have to touch up."

Could the GTR (and STR) be imbedded in a higher grade manifold of grade 5 or even higher instantly or does the boundary condition, that "real spacetime" has 5+ dimensions mean, that GTR/STR are no more meaningful ?

Thanks in advance
Carlo
 
Physics news on Phys.org
eaglechief said:
Summary:: I try to understand if the GTR could work together with theories, where physical reality contains more than 4d

Let's play pretend a progressive alien civilisation contacts us and an irrelevant conversation begins. Later on, an alien-scientist says: "by the way, the physical reality contains 9 dimensions. I heard a famous human theorist announced, that it should be 4. You have to touch up."

Could the GTR (and STR) be imbedded in a higher grade manifold of grade 5 or even higher instantly or does the boundary condition, that "real spacetime" has 5+ dimensions mean, that GTR/STR are no more meaningful ?
At the "I" thread level: What difference could it possibly make? Embedded or not, the world we live in is what it is. GTR is an apt description.

At a higher level, a quick trip to Google says that yes, one can embed a 4 dimensional pseudo-Riemannian manifold in a higher dimensional manifold in a metric-preserving way.

https://mathoverflow.net/questions/127734/nash-embedding-theorems-for-pseudo-riemannian-manifolds.

[Though this stuff is well above my head].
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71, eaglechief and dextercioby
There are many embedding theorems which describe how lower dimensional curved spaces may be embedded into higher dimensional flat spaces. They make no physical predictions so they are usually not worth the effort, but they can be used if desired for aesthetic reasons.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and eaglechief
Thank you for your replies.

My question is heading in that direction: Given we accept as hypothetic boundary condition, that the physical reality contains of say 9 dimensions. Then my assupmtion would be, that STR and GTR are limited in describing the "entire" physical truth, due to it is written in 4d.

As far as i recall modern string-theories deal with 7d, 8d, 9d, ... strings.

So, could STR and GTR describe a 9d reality at all ?

Cheers
Carlo
 
I don’t think that 9 dimensions is sufficient. Are you really interested specifically in 9 dimensions or was that just a random number used as an example?

See: On the Global Isometric Embedding of Pseudo-Riemannian Manifolds
C. J. S. Clarke
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences
Vol. 314, No. 1518 (Jan. 13, 1970), pp. 417-428 (12 pages)
Published By: Royal Society
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
After post #4 it isn't clear what the question is. Are you asking about imbedings in the mathematical sense? Or are you asking whether space-time is actually higher dimensional and we only see 4 of the dimensions and how GR handles this?
 
Thanks for your replies.
dave: 9d was just a random number.
martin: this >> Or are you asking whether space-time is actually higher dimensional and we only see 4 of the dimensions and how GR handles this?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
24
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K