GW150914 Redshift: Cosmological & Gravitational

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Leo.Ki
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the gravitational redshift of GW150914, particularly its estimation in relation to the merging black holes. It highlights the complexity of redshift patterns due to varying distances from the phenomenon, specifically addressing three distance regimes: near field, far field, and cosmological distances. The conversation emphasizes that gravitational redshift can only be defined in stationary spacetimes and suggests that numerical relativity simulations likely accounted for these effects. The conclusion is that the gravitational redshift is inherently included in the calculations and cannot be isolated from the dynamic gravitational environment.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational waves and their properties
  • Familiarity with cosmological redshift concepts
  • Knowledge of numerical relativity simulations
  • Basic principles of spacetime and gravitational effects
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of gravitational redshift in stationary vs. non-stationary spacetimes
  • Explore numerical relativity techniques used in gravitational wave simulations
  • Study the implications of redshift in different distance regimes in cosmology
  • Investigate the relationship between gravitational waves and cosmological Doppler shifts
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, physicists, and researchers in gravitational wave astronomy, particularly those studying the implications of redshift in astrophysical phenomena.

Leo.Ki
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
The cosmological redshift of GW150914 was estimated, but what about its gravitational redshift due to it having been produced so close to the merging black holes? I am expecting varying redshifts depending on where in the vicinity of the phenomenon each stretch of wave was created, and when during the evolution of the phenomenon, resulting in a complex redshift pattern. Thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A gravitational redshift can only be defined in a stationary spacetime. We have three distance regimes here: (1) the near field, (2) far field, but small distances compared to cosmological distance scales, and (3) cosmological distances. Only if you look at things from the perspective of distances in the intermediate range do you see gravitational waves on a stationary background. I would assume that since the people doing the numerical relativity simulations were competent, they got all the effects right. Most likely they sampled the results of their calculation in region 2, and then used standard cosmological Doppler shifts to extrapolate from 2 to 3.

I doubt that your idea of conceptualizing the transition from region 1 to region 2 as a varying redshift will work. We simply don't have a way to define such a gravitational redshift so that it extends into region 1, where there is no stationary background.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Leo.Ki
Thank you so much, Ben. I think I see clearer now. The waves being very probably calculated as part of the whole very dynamic gravitational environment, what I described naively as the gravitational redshift would already be included in the package and would not be something that can be clipped out of the equations.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
7K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 134 ·
5
Replies
134
Views
12K