Gravitational Waves: Were They Stronger Long Ago?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the detection of gravitational waves by aLIGO and their potential strength in the early universe. It is established that aLIGO can detect length variations as small as 1/10,000 of a proton's diameter. The participants argue that gravitational waves emitted 8 billion years ago may have been more detectable due to a less expanded universe, suggesting that these waves could have had significant macroscopic effects on molecular structures during that time. The gravitational waves detected by aLIGO currently have a redshift of z=0.09, indicating a 9% redshift since emission.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational wave physics
  • Familiarity with aLIGO detection methods
  • Knowledge of redshift concepts in cosmology
  • Basic principles of wave propagation and intensity decay
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of gravitational wave redshift on detection sensitivity
  • Explore the role of gravitational waves in early universe cosmology
  • Study the mathematical models of wave intensity decay, specifically ##1/r^2##
  • Investigate the effects of gravitational waves on molecular structures in theoretical physics
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, physicists, cosmologists, and anyone interested in the implications of gravitational waves on the early universe and molecular interactions.

Gerinski
Messages
322
Reaction score
15
In order to detect gravitational waves at our present time and location, aLIGO has required a mind-boggling sensitivity, if I understand well it can detect variations in length in the order of 1/10,000 of the diameter of a proton.

But space has stretched a lot during the universe's history. If I am correct in assuming that gravitational waves redshift in the same way as EM waves, one should expect that the same sort of gravitational waves we have observed now as so weak, if they happened 8 billion years ago, and therefore closer to us, when space was much more "compact", might have been much more easily detectable, they had not yet redshifted. They might have caused a length variation which was detectable more easily back then, and it's only because space has stretched so much that they are so difficult to detect now.

Is this reasoning correct?

And if so, what could that mean if gravitational waves had "macroscopic" effects very early in the universe, because space was still very "compact"? Could gravitational waves have had any influence in the way the universe developed? I mean for example, the passing of a gravitational wave in our epoch on a complex molecule will not change anything, the distance variations it causes are far too small for any interactions between the subatomic particles to vary.

But let's say very early in the universe, a very strong gravitational wave passed a complex molecule and the distance variation it caused between its subatomic particles was enough for the particles to lose their bonding, they became loose from each other and the molecule was broken by the gravitational wave.

Does this make any sense?

TX !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The gravitational waves detected by LIGO were at a redshift of z=0.09, so they have only redshifted by 9% since they were emitted.
 
Like any spherical wave pattern, the gravitational waves aLIGO detected had an intensity that fell off as ##1/r^2##, because the energy is getting diluted over a larger and larger area. There is also a cosmological Doppler shift on top of this, but as phyzguy pointed out, that's a relatively small effect.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K