Gyroscopes: Can Two Masses Stabilize?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the stability of a system with two counter-rotating gyroscopes mounted on a common spindle. Participants explore whether the angular momentum of the two gyros cancels out, leading to instability, or if they can stabilize each other, maintaining an upright position. It is suggested that counter-rotating gyros may provide enhanced stability compared to those spinning in the same direction, as their opposing precessional effects could reinforce each other. The conversation also touches on the impact of mass distribution between the gyros on precession dynamics, indicating that a lighter outer gyro could balance precession. Overall, the consensus leans towards the idea that the system could act as a stable platform under certain conditions.
Zeinin
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hey! this is my first post here, and I apologize if it is in the incorrect forum, but I have been banging my head against the wall over this concept and I can't seem to find a straight answer. It concerns gyroscopes.

The question is, can two counter-rotating masses on a common spindle stabilize? or does the angular momentum cancel out, causing the gyro to fall as if it had never been spun at all? Here is an image that might make it more clear:
http://waffleimages.inorpo.com/files/db/db30ce33c1c79796a5c309b88325f37936c1ed5d.jpe
The red and blue rings are the masses in question, and they are attached to the spindle via the yellow ball bearings. They counter-rotate, as evidenced by the green arrows showing the direction of rotation for each mass. Assuming that both rings are spinning at the same rate, and lower point of the frame is placed on a table, what will happen?
There are two possible outcomes here:
1. As the rate of spin drops due to friction, the inclination to precess is canceled out by the opposite rotations, meaning it stays upright until the last possible moment.
2. The two masses cancel each other's angular velocity and the whole assembly falls as it would if there was no spin on the weights.

My hope is that the device will act as traditional one-weight gyro, but with a much greater inclination toward stability. Remember, the spindle/frame is rotationally isolated from the weights. Will it fall, or will be rock steady?
 

Attachments

  • gyro.jpg
    gyro.jpg
    20 KB · Views: 625
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your link comes up as a forbidden page, and the attachments aren't yet approved, so your answer will have to wait. From the written description, though, I believe that it would be a stable platform.
 
Counter rotating gyros should act as if they aren't spinning, except there are huge stresses in the bearings.
 
Stable platform. The mass in the gyros is in motion, all that motion (for one gyro) is along a plane. This gives the device inertia causing it to tend to stay aligned with that plane. Cuasing the motion of those masses to divert from alignment to that plane requires a force. Since the two planes are parralel to each other, niether gyro is providing a force to divert the other and in fact each is reinforcing the the other. Rotation in oppsite directions means that some or most of the effects of precession will oppose and cancel out, giving a platform that is more stable than two gyros rotating in the same direction.
 
LURCH said:
Stable platform. The mass in the gyros is in motion, all that motion (for one gyro) is along a plane. This gives the device inertia causing it to tend to stay aligned with that plane. Cuasing the motion of those masses to divert from alignment to that plane requires a force. Since the two planes are parralel to each other, niether gyro is providing a force to divert the other and in fact each is reinforcing the the other. Rotation in oppsite directions means that some or most of the effects of precession will oppose and cancel out, giving a platform that is more stable than two gyros rotating in the same direction.
I have a question for you. I've assumed these two gyros are of equal mass. Viewed from above, if the gyro furthest from the point of support tries to precess clockwise, and the other gyro (spinning in the opposite direction) wants to precess counterclockwise, then the sum precession will be clockwise due to the outer gyro having greater leverage.

Is that right so far?

So, if we make the outer gyro of less mass than the inner gyro, is it possible to balance precession?
 
Jeff Reid said:
Counter rotating gyros should act as if they aren't spinning, except there are huge stresses in the bearings.
Now that I see the diagram, the "outer" gyro will provide the dominant precession reaction, but the angular momentum will be greatly reduced compared to a normal gyro.

link videos showing that opposite spin is different than same spin:

http://demoroom.physics.ncsu.edu/html/demos/252.html

So, if we make the outer gyro of less mass than the inner gyro, is it possible to balance precession?
Yes, or the same mass but spinning slower than the inner gyro.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
6K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K