Half-Plane in R^3: Explanation and Analysis

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathewsMD
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The equation theta = pi/4 describes a surface that can be interpreted differently depending on the coordinate system used, such as 2D polar, 3D cylindrical, or spherical coordinates. The discussion highlights that if the convention restricts r to be non-negative, the surface represents a half-plane for x greater than or equal to 0. If negative values for r are allowed, it could extend to form a full plane, including points where x is less than 0. The inconsistency in texts regarding the treatment of r creates confusion, but understanding these conventions clarifies the nature of the surface. Ultimately, the interpretation hinges on the chosen coordinate system and the restrictions placed on r.
MathewsMD
Messages
430
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement



Describe in words the surface whose equation is given by theta = pi/4

2. The attempt at a solution


It is a fairly simple question, but I'm just trying to understand why this is considered a half-plane that exists for x that is greater than or equal to 0. There are no restriction on r or z. Given this, cannot r be negative? Wouldn't this make a full-plane and let it extend for x less than 0? I just don't quite see why it cannot have the point (-1, pi/4, 0), for example, which would be present for x less than 0. Any feedback is always appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MathewsMD said:

Homework Statement



Describe in words the surface whose equation is given by theta = pi/4

2. The attempt at a solution


It is a fairly simple question, but I'm just trying to understand why this is considered a half-plane that exists for x that is greater than or equal to 0. There are no restriction on r or z. Given this, cannot r be negative? Wouldn't this make a full-plane and let it extend for x less than 0? I just don't quite see why it cannot have the point (-1, pi/4, 0), for example, which would be present for x less than 0. Any feedback is always appreciated!

First of all, you haven't told us what coordinate system you are using. ##\theta = \frac \pi 4## makes sense in 2D polar coordinates, 3D cylindrical coordinates, and in spherical coordinates. In spherical coordinates it might be a plane or cone, depending on what convention you use for ##\theta##.

But, to answer your question, you seem to understand what is going on perfectly well. Texts are inconsistent about whether or not ##r<0## is used in polar or cylindrical coordinates. If you are using the convention ##r\ge 0## you get a half plane as you say, and if ##r## is allowed to go negative you get the whole plane, as you understand. One problem with disallowing negative values of ##r## is that you don't see all 3 leaves of the rose ##r = \sin(3\theta)## for ##0\le\theta\le \pi##.

I wouldn't worry too much about this if I were you since you understand it just fine.
 
  • Like
Likes MathewsMD
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K