Handling Random Uncertainties: Best Practices for Niles

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Niles
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Random Uncertainties
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
8 replies · 3K views
Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0
Hi

In http://sl-proj-bi-specification.web.cern.ch/sl-proj-bi-specification/Activities/Glossary/techglos.pdf it says that: ... if the sources of uncertainties are numerous, the Gaussian distribution is generally a good approximation.

I don't quite understand why. The Central Limit Theorem (CLT) only says that if we have a sum S of N random variables, then S will be Gaussian for very large N. So the CLT does not explain the above. In that case, where does the statement come from?Niles.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
But that would only explain why the errors are Gaussian, not why the measured variable is Gaussian.
 
If the problem is a location problem, the "model" can be described as

Variable = Mean value + Random error

with "Mean value" a constant. Since the random error is Gaussian, so is the variable.
 
statdad said:
If the problem is a location problem, the "model" can be described as ...

I am not sure I understand what you mean by "location problem". In my case we are talking about measured speeds.
 
A "location problem" simply means you are trying to determine the mean value of a variable. A mean is one type of measure of location, or measure of center.

I don't know exactly what type of problem you're involved in: my posts above were

1) to show how the Gaussian distribution arises from the "many sources of uncertainty"
2) to show one way in which a measured random quantity can be assumed to have a gaussian distribution
 
Ok, I understand. In post #2 and #4 you use "error" and "uncertainty" interchangeably. Does

Variable = Mean value + Uncertainty

also hold for a location problem?Niles.
 
I guess - the main idea is that the variable is a constant value + some unmeasurable random behavior, which is often modeled by a normal (Gaussian) distribution.

An approach slightly more general than the location model is given by

Variable = Model + Error

where ``Model'' is some deterministic (non-random) expression. Consider multiple regression:

[tex] Y = \underbrace{\beta_0 + \beta_1 x_1 + \dots + \beta_p x_p}_{\text{Model}} + \varepsilon[/tex]

with [itex]\varepsilon[/itex] is the random error component
 
Last edited:
Thanks, it was very kind of you.

Best wishes,
Niles.