Handshake paradox involving the Starship Enterprise

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a thought experiment involving the Starship Enterprise traveling at relativistic speeds and the implications of time dilation and simultaneity as experienced by Captain Kirk and Mr. Spock during a handshake with the Martian president. The scope includes theoretical considerations of special relativity, time dilation, and the relativity of simultaneity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the handshake duration as perceived from the Enterprise's frame of reference would be significantly longer due to time dilation effects.
  • Others argue that time dilation is symmetrical, meaning that both the Enterprise and Mars clocks would appear to tick at different rates depending on the observer's frame of reference.
  • A later reply questions the assumption that Mars and Earth clocks are aligned, suggesting that discrepancies arise from their relative motion.
  • Some participants present mathematical inequalities regarding the relationship between the times measured by Spock, the ship, and Mars, but these are challenged by others who assert that the inequalities depend on the chosen frame of reference.
  • There is a discussion about the relativity of simultaneity, with participants noting that different observers can disagree on the timing of events due to their relative velocities.
  • One participant expresses confusion about the alignment of clocks and the implications of time dilation, indicating a need for further study on the topic.
  • Another participant introduces Minkowski diagrams to illustrate the relationships between the different frames of reference in a visual manner.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally do not reach a consensus, as multiple competing views remain regarding the interpretation of time dilation, simultaneity, and the mathematical relationships between the clocks of Spock, the ship, and Mars.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on the definitions of simultaneity and the assumptions regarding the relative motion of the Earth, Mars, and the Enterprise. The discussion reflects various interpretations of special relativity without resolving the mathematical discrepancies presented.

  • #31
ilario980 said:
I expected the last two diagrams to be just rotated, but they follow the Lorentz transformation so do not agree space/time measurements
They do. A Minkowski diagram is drawn on the two-dimensional surface of a computer screen or a sheet of paper which obeys Euclidean geometry so the Pythagorean theorem works: if we have two points ##(x_1,y_1)## and ##(x_2,y_2)## the distance ##s## between them is given by ##s^2=(x_2-x_1)^2+(y_2-y_1)^2##. However, spacetime is non-Euclidean - ##s^2=(x_2-x_1)^2-(t_2-t_1)^2## - so when we plot our ##(x,t)## points on the sheet of paper the distance between the points on the sheet of paper doesn't correspond to the actual spacetime distance.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ilario980
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
ilario980 said:
I expected the last two diagrams to be just rotated,
They are Lorentz boosted, which turns out to be the Minkowski spacetime analog of a Euclidean rotation, but they are not rotated in the Euclidean sense, no. The axes of the boosted frame "scissor" together towards the ##ct=x## line - at least, as they are drawn on the first diagram. They remain orthogonal in the Minkowski sense, which is why they are drawn orthogonal in the last diagram.
ilario980 said:
they follow the Lorentz transformation so do not agree space/time measurements
They have different definitions of space and time, yes, but as Nugatory notes they do share measurements like ##c^2\Delta t^2-\Delta x^2##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ilario980 and Dale
  • #33
this question puzzled me, so now i'm on vacation from my job and can give this answer

if spoke back to earth instead of mars this becomes similar to twin paradox and at start time both frame agree [x=0, t=0]

while ship is moving measure a slower earth clock but the two frames becomes equals if ship stop "immediatly" on spock landing and both
clocks start ticking at same rate starting from [ x=0, t=tlanding] and [ x=xsheeplanding
, t=t'landing]; in a sense time dilation can be
thought as some sort of delay other than that given by finite speed of light

at start time both frames agree [x=0, t=0] and ship start moving at c/2 (γ=1.15)
after 2 days spock leaves ship (in a flat space time)

after 4 days spock back to earth
to keep speed of light constant Lorentz transformations shrink to whole universe in x direction of ship frame, so earth frame measure ship at [ x=2 daysLight , t=4days] moving at speed c/2;
at t'=0 ship measure distance of 2 daysLight as 1.732 daysLight, it reach this equivalent distance (in a shrunken universe) in just 3.464 days moving at speed c/2

in conclusion 3 seconds of handskake from earth frame is measured as 3*γ seconds in ship frame, but this is a "delayed" measure because if ship stops immediatly when spock land on earth, it measures a shorter time than earth clock
 
  • #34
Ibix said:
Mars started their clocks at the same time (by their frame's definition of "the same time") as Enterprise left Earth - but here you can see that (by Enterprise's definition of "at the same time") they started early but Earth didn't.
I read your very illustrative post, what about this last sentence ? In the first part by their you mean clocks Einstein's synchronized in Mars's rest frame and their common/shared definition of "the same time", I believe.

In the last diagram, which is the "zero" Mars's clock tick ? It is the one red on the bottom right that is on "the same time" straight line that joins it to the green/blue/grey tick at the origin?
 
Last edited:
  • #35
cianfa72 said:
I read your very illustrative post, what about this last sentence ? In the first part by their you mean clocks Einstein's synchronized in Mars's rest frame and their common/shared definition of "the same time", I believe.

In the last diagram, which is the "zero" Mars's clock tick ? It is the one red on the bottom right that is on "the same time" straight line that joins it to the green/blue/grey tick at the origin?
The answers to these questions are obvious to anyone who knows how to read spacetime diagrams. If you don't, please learn how offline. You are hijacking someone else's thread and you have now been banned from further posts in this thread.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters, Motore and Vanadium 50

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 115 ·
4
Replies
115
Views
9K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 84 ·
3
Replies
84
Views
8K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K