Harmonic oscillator with ladder operators - proof using the Sum Rule

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on verifying the proof of the sum rule for the one-dimensional harmonic oscillator using ladder operators. The user attempts to express momentum \( p \) in terms of the ladder operators \( b \) and \( b^\dagger \) and calculates the inner product \( \langle l | p | n \rangle \). A suggestion is made to calculate \( (b - b^\dagger) | n \rangle \) to simplify the process, rather than directly using the absolute value squared. The conversation emphasizes the importance of using commutation relations and considering the properties of operators in quantum mechanics to facilitate the proof. The user is guided to approach the problem more straightforwardly rather than complicating the calculations.
chocopanda
Messages
15
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Verify the proof of the sum rule for the one-dimensional harmonic oscillator:
$$\sum_l^\infty (E_l-E_n)\ | \langle l \ |p| \ n \rangle |^2 = \frac {mh^2w^2}{2} $$
Relevant Equations
The exercise explicitly says to use laddle operators and to express $p$ with
$$b=\sqrt{\frac {mw}{2 \hbar}}-\frac {ip}{\sqrt{2 \hbar mw}} $$
$$b^\dagger =\sqrt{\frac {mw}{2 \hbar}}+\frac {ip}{\sqrt{2 \hbar mw}} $$
I'm trying verify the proof of the sum rule for the one-dimensional harmonic oscillator:
$$\sum_l^\infty (E_l-E_n)\ | \langle l \ |p| \ n \rangle |^2 = \frac {mh^2w^2}{2} $$
The exercise explicitly says to use laddle operators and to express $p$ with
$$b=\sqrt{\frac {mw}{2 \hbar}}-\frac {ip}{\sqrt{2 \hbar mw}} $$
$$b^\dagger =\sqrt{\frac {mw}{2 \hbar}}+\frac {ip}{\sqrt{2 \hbar mw}} $$

For p I get $$p=i \sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{2mw}} (b-b^\dagger) $$

To solve the exercise, we need to calculate the left side. I'm still very much a novice and am not very sure how to use the ladder operators... To start, I at least tried to expand the bra-ket:
$$\sum_l^\infty (E_l-E_n)\ \langle l \ |p| \ n \rangle \langle n \ |p| \ l \rangle $$
and tried to insert the p I solved:
$$\sum_l^\infty (E_l-E_n)\ (-\frac{\hbar}{2mw}) \langle l \ |b-b^\dagger| \ n \rangle \langle n \ |b-b^\dagger| \ l \rangle $$
is this correct? If yes, how do I continue? The hint says to probably use $$H|n\rangle=\hbar(n+\frac 12)|n\rangle$$ and I know that $$H|n\rangle=E|n\rangle$$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
chocopanda said:
To start, I at least tried to expand the bra-ket:
$$\sum_l^\infty (E_l-E_n)\ \langle l \ |p| \ n \rangle \langle n \ |p| \ l \rangle $$
I wouldn't do that right away. I would start by calculating ##\langle l \ |p| \ n \rangle## first, and then consider the absolute value squared.

chocopanda said:
and tried to insert the p I solved:
$$\sum_l^\infty (E_l-E_n)\ (-\frac{\hbar}{2mw}) \langle l \ |b-b^\dagger| \ n \rangle \langle n \ |b-b^\dagger| \ l \rangle $$
is this correct? If yes, how do I continue?
Calculate ##(b-b^\dagger) |n\rangle##.
 
DrClaude said:
I wouldn't do that right away. I would start by calculating ##\langle l \ |p| \ n \rangle## first, and then consider the absolute value squared.Calculate ##(b-b^\dagger) |n\rangle##.

Hello DrClaude, thank you for replying. I tried to do what you suggested:

$$| \langle l|p|n \rangle |^2 = \langle n|p^2|n\rangle = \frac{h}{2mw} (2n+1) $$
That's my result. How would I continue?
 
chocopanda said:
Hello DrClaude, thank you for replying. I tried to do what you suggested:

$$| \langle l|p|n \rangle |^2 = \langle n|p^2|n\rangle = \frac{h}{2mw} (2n+1) $$
That's my result. How would I continue?
That's not correct. How can the bra ##\langle l |## even become ##\langle n |##?

As I said, forget the absolute value squared for now. Start by calculating ##(b-b^\dagger) |n\rangle## and then apply that to ## \langle l|p|n \rangle##.
 
Are you forced to do it in that complicated way? It's simpler to use the commutation relations, ##[\hat{x},\hat{p}]=?##, ##[\hat{H},\hat{x}]=?## as well as to think about what's
$$\sum_{i} |\langle n|\hat{O}|i \rangle|^2=?$$
for a general operator ##\hat{O}##.
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K