Has anyone taken an astronomy class

  • Thread starter Thread starter land_of_ice
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Astronomy Class
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the content and structure of astronomy classes offered at junior colleges, particularly introductory courses. Participants share their experiences and insights regarding the topics covered, the depth of the material, and the overall educational value of such courses.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that introductory astronomy courses typically cover topics such as stars, planets, galaxies, and the big bang, often without heavy mathematical content.
  • Others note that while these topics are included, the treatment is often superficial, with limited depth in areas like stellar spectra classification.
  • One participant mentions that their experience in astronomy classes involved no math and was primarily open book, indicating a general overview rather than in-depth study.
  • Another participant argues that there is a significant difference between introductory courses and higher-level classes, which require a strong foundation in physics and mathematics.
  • A participant expresses dissatisfaction with the pace of their current class, suggesting that it is too remedial, but acknowledges the interesting material covered in a previous course.
  • Topics discussed in more advanced classes include planetary motion, the expansion of the universe, and the formation and evolution of stars, among others.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that introductory astronomy courses are broad and not mathematically intensive, but there is disagreement regarding the depth and value of these courses, with some feeling they are too superficial and others finding them beneficial.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the lack of advanced courses for those with prior knowledge in physics, indicating a potential gap in the curriculum for students seeking more challenging material.

land_of_ice
Messages
136
Reaction score
0
what do you learn in an astronomy class, considering taking one , this is not at a university, but at a junior college. Just curious about what topics are covered.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Depends - there is quite a lot of astronomy to cover!

Assuming this is an intro, none maths heavy sort of course it will probably cover general intro, stars, planets, galaxies, the big bang.
Perhaps steller structure and evolution - nuclear reactions in stars, the HR diagram.

It might also have observing techniques, astronomical coordinate systems, using telescopes etc if they have an observatory.
 
In my astronomy 101 class at a community college, all of the above was covered, though in a very brief, superficial way. The only thing that got even slightly deep was learning how to read and classify stellar spectra.
 
Jack21222 said:
In my astronomy 101 class at a community college, all of the above was covered, though in a very brief, superficial way. The only thing that got even slightly deep was learning how to read and classify stellar spectra.

This is about how mine was as well.

No math at all and everything was open book. Very general. Just think of it for what it is; a general type class to help you decide your major. If you want something that gets into any sort of depth, you'll probably want to take a higher level one. And from what I learned in my class, I'm sure you'd be okay skipping this and taking the next level class.

I can relate it to a chem class I took. First one was a 101 type class. No real math, very very general. Then a few years later I took a 1000 level class. Way more math, way more detailed. Made the chem 101 class seem like a total waste of time.
 
Very few institutions, and I would wager no community colleges, have an intense calculus-based intro astronomy course. There is often a very sharp separation between the 100 level description and at the most formula utilization (plug numbers into kepler's laws!) classes, and then the upper level classes which presuppose several years of physics and mathematics.

If what people are describing sounds like what you might be interested in, then go for it. But don't expect #2.
 
i took astronomy 2 this past summer and am currently enrolled in astronomy 1. i don't attend the class because it moves at too remedial a pace, and i usually have something to do in my lab that would be more productive than watching a man try to explain the doppler effect or retrograde motion to people who do not and may never understand it. The material itself is very interesting, especially in astronomy 2. I have learned a number of new things that I didn't know before taking it. I would highly recommend this course, even if it means skipping your lectures and reading the chapters yourself for the tests.

It would be nice to have mid-level astronomy class available to people who have taken modern physics, but you can't have everything, and not everyone wants to take their science credits that late in their undergrad career

Topics we touched on in the two semesters were characterization of the planets, planetary motion (the concepts, no real math), expansion of the universe, the structures of stars, galaxies, nebulae, dust clouds, and local systems, formation of stars and their evolution and death, evidence supporting the big bang theory, interpretation of spectra and other methods used to range stars, and others
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K