Has the Fermi-Dirac Integral been solved?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter patric44
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fermi-dirac Integral
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Fermi-Dirac Integral has not been solved analytically in a general sense, despite the existence of a formula relating it to the polylogarithm function: $$F_{j}(x) = -Li_{j+1}(-e^{x})$$. Recent discussions highlight that while this formula is supported by the Digital Library of Mathematical Functions (DLMF), numerical solutions are still being explored due to the complexity of computing polylogarithms. The use of generalized Gauss-Laguerre integration has been effective for specific parameter ranges, but it is not universally applicable.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fermi-Dirac statistics
  • Familiarity with polylogarithm functions
  • Knowledge of numerical integration techniques, specifically Gauss-Laguerre quadrature
  • Basic concepts of special functions, including hyper-geometric and Meijer functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties and applications of polylogarithm functions
  • Study numerical methods for evaluating the Fermi-Dirac Integral
  • Explore the DLMF for further insights on special functions
  • Investigate the convergence criteria for series expansions of special functions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and researchers working with statistical mechanics or quantum statistics, particularly those interested in numerical methods for complex integrals.

patric44
Messages
308
Reaction score
40
TL;DR
has the Fermi-Dirac Integral been solved?
hi guys
I have a question about whether or not the Fermi-Dirac Integral has Been solved, because i found a formula on Wikipedia that relates the Fermi-Dirac integral with the polylogarithm function:
$$F_{j}(x) = -Li_{j+1}(-e^{x})$$
and in some recent papers they claim that no analytical solution exist, plus if the formula on Wikipedia is correct why there are some recent papers discussing a Numerical solution for particular cases of the Fermi-Dirac integral?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The formula is probably correct since it agrees with DLMF
https://dlmf.nist.gov/25.12#iii
which is very reliable. However, computing the polylogarithm is not easy in general, and I’m not surprised that you can find papers discussing different numerical methods. The only time I have needed polylogarithms I used the integral definition
https://dlmf.nist.gov/25.12#E11
along with generalized Gauss-Laguerre integration.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gauss-Laguerre_quadrature
It worked fine for the parameter range I cared about, but it is probably not a general approach that is practical for all situations.

Jason
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: patric44
Well, writing the F-D integral (or the B-E integral) in terms of known special functions (most of them essentially reducible to hyper-geometric functions or Meijer functions) is an analytical solution, if the series expansion is convergent. You can't expect that these integrals are expressible in a finite combination of elementary functions...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K