A Has the merger of a neutron star and an anti-neutron star been modeled?

AI Thread Summary
The collision of a neutron star and an anti-neutron star could result in complete annihilation, formation of a black hole, or partial annihilation, with energy from the event potentially pushing remaining matter away. Annihilation is complex, involving the generation of various particles like pions, neutrinos, and photons, rather than just converting to pure energy. The energetic environment would likely create a range of new particles, with a significant amount of stellar material ejected into space. The outcomes would differ based on the nature of the collision, such as a direct hit versus a grazing impact. Current modeling is limited due to uncertainties in the equations of state for neutron stars and the improbability of anti-neutron stars existing in the universe.
Cato
Messages
56
Reaction score
10
TL;DR Summary
What would happen if a neutron star and an antineutron star collided
If a neutron star and an anti neutron star collided, would they 1) completely annihilate each other, 2) form a black hole, or 3) partially annihilate each other with the remaining stars being pushed away from each other by the energy created?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
None of those options are mutually exclusive. Often we think of annihilation as two particles interacting with each other and turning into photons (so-called 'pure energy', which is more like two particles turning into two other particles). The reality is much more complicated though, especially when you get into composite particles and high-mass particles.

Protons and neutrons (and their anti- particles) often generate a shower of pions, which themselves decay into neutrinos, photons, and muons. Beyond the possible interactions and decays of pairs or single particles, the environment in a neutron star-antineutron star annihilation would be so energetic that you'd likely generate all kinds of different particles. I'd expect a portion of the stellar material to be blasted into space along with some of this newly created matter.

So there's not really a difference between a partial and a complete annihilation, as both can leave large amounts of matter behind.

As for option 2, this can happen regardless of the annihilation process. At least some portion of the annihilation and explosion could occur inside of the event horizon formed by the merger of the two stars.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes topsquark and Ibix
I'd add that I don't know that I'd expect a unique answer. A direct head-on collision is likely quite a different thing from a grazing impact.

I'd also add that I doubt that anyone's modelled this because as far as I know the equations of state in the interior of neutron stars are not known with any real certainty, and they'd matter a lot here.
 
  • Like
Likes topsquark and Drakkith
Probably nobody has spent any effort doing this because it is highly unlikely that an anti-neutron star exists in our universe.
 
  • Like
Likes phinds, ohwilleke, PeroK and 6 others
Correct...I was thinking of "complete annihilation" as leaving behind only photons -- that was mistaken. Yes, Ibix, I could imagine a grazing impact -- at what? more than half the speed of light? -- producing something very different from a head on collision. Would be something to see. Thanks for the answers.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top