Having a problem in steps while solving integrals

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the steps involved in deriving kinematic equations through integration and differentiation in calculus. The user expresses confusion about the manipulation of variables, particularly how to integrate acceleration and velocity, and the logic behind taking constants out of integrals. Responses clarify that the integral of a derivative is the original function, referencing the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, and emphasize that in physics, certain manipulations are accepted even if they seem mathematically questionable. The user acknowledges their misunderstanding of treating velocity as a constant and gains clarity on the concepts discussed. Overall, the conversation highlights the importance of foundational calculus principles in solving physics problems.
prakhargupta3301
Messages
58
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


My problem is in integral calculus (I'm new to it).
I know what it is and how it works (basically. I'm not too advanced right now).
The problem is as following: (I will be posting comments/reasons along with what I've done and with what logic/understanding I've done it. Please correct me if I'm wrong.)
I was trying to derive kinematic equations using differentiation.
a=d(v)/dt -{1. here, we differentiated velocity w.r.t time}
∫adt= ∫d(v) -{2. here, we have multiplied both sides by dt. I don't know how that's even possible but my teacher told it that way. If there is some other underlying logic, please be kind enough to enlighten me.}
at|vu= v -{3. a is taken as a constant. So, it comes out of the integration as it is. Integral of dv is v( how? I don't know. My teacher told it this way. (He explained it this way: Sum of multiple small dv's will be v. I got it during the class, but now I have a doubt. With respect to what are integrating dv?)
at=v-u
Derived.

Homework Equations


x_x_x

The Attempt at a Solution


This isn't a problem but a doubt in my understanding. So there are no attempts. I have already written what all there is.
Please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Those are standard steps so there isn't a lot to say except that's the way integration works. I would, however, do it differently. Starting with

##a = \frac{dv}{dt}##

I would integrate that equation with respect to ##t##.

##\int_{t_0}^{t_1} a dt = \int_{t_0}^{t_1} \frac{dv}{dt} dt##

Now, remembering that the integral is an anti derivative, we have

##\int_{t_0}^{t_1} a dt = v(t_1) - v(t_0)##

And, if ##a## is a constant, we have:

##a(t_1 - t_0) = v(t_1) - v (t_0)##
 
  • Like
Likes prakhargupta3301
Hi,

Perhaps it helps you if you rephrase the ##d## in ##dt## by

" ##\Delta## with the understanding that we take the limit ##\Delta \downarrow 0## "

that way you 'see' that ## a \,dt = dv ## and all of those manipulations that physicists do without much consideration. For mathematicians it can be a horror to look at them, but in physics functions are generally well-behaved enough to talk like this.
 
  • Like
Likes prakhargupta3301
PeroK said:
I would integrate that equation with respect to ttt.

∫t1t0adt=∫t1t0dvdtdt∫t0t1adt=∫t0t1dvdtdt\int_{t_0}^{t_1} a dt = \int_{t_0}^{t_1} \frac{dv}{dt} dt

Now, remembering that the integral is an anti derivative, we have

∫t1t0adt=v(t1)−v(t0)∫t0t1adt=v(t1)−v(t0)\int_{t_0}^{t_1} a dt = v(t_1) - v(t_0)
So, if there is a differentiation inside an integral, then what happens? I don't get how you just take it (v) out. (I understand differentiation is just opposite of integration, but I'm new to one being inside the other. Can you break it a bit more please?)
(I don't get what is wrong with the reply mech. Please don't mind the raw code for the equation. I don't know how this works so please forgive me)
Thank you.
 
prakhargupta3301 said:
So, if there is a differentiation inside an integral, then what happens? I don't get how you just take it (v) out. (I understand differentiation is just opposite of integration, but I'm new to one being inside the other. Can you break it a bit more please?)
(I don't get what is wrong with the reply mech. Please don't mind the raw code for the equation. I don't know how this works so please forgive me)
Thank you.
That the integral of the derivative of a function is the function is the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.

You need to know that before you can move on with integration.
 
  • Like
Likes prakhargupta3301
BvU said:
Hi,

Perhaps it helps you if you rephrase the ##d## in ##dt## by

" ##\Delta## with the understanding that we take the limit ##\Delta \downarrow 0## "

that way you 'see' that ## a \,dt = dv ## and all of those manipulations that physicists do without much consideration. For mathematicians it can be a horror to look at them, but in physics functions are generally well-behaved enough to talk like this.

So, you're trying to say that mathematically, this is wrong, but in physics such manipulations work so I needn't worry?
Also, Just to be sure, what you wrote in the double quotation marks means: Change where we take the lowest limit to be nearly equal to 0?
Thank you.
 
PeroK said:
That the integral of the derivative of a function is the function is the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.

You need to know that before you can move on with integration.
Ok. I think I get it now. (Perhaps I'm getting these many silly doubts is because we aren't being taught calculus in totality but bits and pieces of it in Mathematical Tools section of physics class.)
Also, earlier I was thinking of v as a constant (I know that was ignorant of me) but I now realize it's a function!
Anyways, I checked it and now I know the Fundamental theorem of Calculus. Thanks to you!
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK

Similar threads

  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
8K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
2K