Hawking Bets $100 the LHC Will Not Find The Higgs

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Stephen Hawking has placed a $100 bet that the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) will not find the Higgs boson, while expressing confidence that it may discover a supersymmetric partner. The discussion highlights Hawking's history of bets, including a notable one with Kip Thorne regarding black holes and information loss. Participants emphasize the complexity of particle detection at the LHC, noting that significant results may not emerge for at least a year after operations commence. The conversation also touches on the implications of discovering the Higgs boson and the potential for Nobel prizes based on experimental outcomes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of particle physics and the Standard Model
  • Familiarity with the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) operations
  • Knowledge of supersymmetry and Higgs boson theories
  • Awareness of Hawking radiation and its implications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Higgs boson discovery on the Standard Model of particle physics
  • Learn about the operational mechanics of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC)
  • Study the principles of supersymmetry and its significance in modern physics
  • Explore the concept of Hawking radiation and its relevance to black hole physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particle physics students, researchers in theoretical physics, and anyone interested in the implications of the LHC experiments and the search for fundamental particles.

  • #31
Hi tribdog.. :smile:
I heard the synthetic voice actually say it.
The $100 bet (BBC interview) was great fun, but I forget the context of some of it.
I am going to try and find a link for it.

OK - I found it..
http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_7598000/7598686.stm"

G
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
cristo said:
As George has said above, if radiation from black holes is detected at the LHC, then Hawking will get a Nobel prize: I don't think there's any "maybe" about it!

Neither does he, apparently :rolleyes:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
14K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
16K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K