Hawking radiation temperature -- observer dependent?

bcrelling
Messages
69
Reaction score
2
Black holes are claimed to radiate at a temperature corresponding to the hawking radiation. But who is measuring the temperature? If the radiation is measured from far away the red shift will indicate a lower temperature won't it?

Is the temperature given by the formula as measured from a hypothetical probe suspended at the event horizon? If so, will the proper acceleration of the probe experience unruh radiation too, or in this case would they be one and the same thing(unruh and hawking radiation)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is an absolute temperature scale.
 
Hawking temperature is the temperature measured by an observer far away from the horizon. An observer close to the horizon will see a higher temperature.
 
Demystifier said:
Hawking temperature is the temperature measured by an observer far away from the horizon. An observer close to the horizon will see a higher temperature.

Would the increased temperature as measured by an observer at the horizon be definable?

Is this where the idea of the black hole fire wall comes from?
 
bcrelling said:
Would the increased temperature as measured by an observer at the horizon be definable?
It would be infinite, but infinity can be replaced by a large finite number by appropriate regularization.

bcrelling said:
Is this where the idea of the black hole fire wall comes from?
It is closely related to it.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top