Exploring the Relationship Between Heart Rate and Calorie Burn During Exercise

  • Thread starter Evil Bunny
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Heart Rate
In summary, an individual's metabolism (the rate at which they burn calories) is a significant factor in how many calories they burn during physical activity, but there is a correlation between heart rate and calorie burn.
  • #1
Evil Bunny
241
0
Is there a direct correlation between calorie burn and heart rate?

If an athlete and a couch potato each weighed 175 lbs and ran a mile in 10 minutes, would they burn the same amount of calories?

I would assume the couch potato would have a much higher heart rate during this event. Does that make any difference at all?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #2
The main duties of heart are to regulate temperature keeping it constant, to bring O2 and to bring away CO2.
So O2 increases if heart rate increase. But O2 reacts and burns calories if there is a request of muscular force.
I think then there is a correlation if we want get motion of body, for example, but yet one can have a patology with very frequently beats without do any movement.
 
  • Like
Likes Greg Bernhardt
  • #3
Evil Bunny said:
Is there a direct correlation between calorie burn and heart rate?

If an athlete and a couch potato each weighed 175 lbs and ran a mile in 10 minutes, would they burn the same amount of calories?

I would assume the couch potato would have a much higher heart rate during this event. Does that make any difference at all?
This should help answer.

A closer look at physical activity and metabolism

While you don't have much control over the speed of your basal metabolism, you can control how many calories you burn through your level of physical activity. The more active you are, the more calories you burn. In fact, some people who are said to have a fast metabolism are probably just more active — and maybe more fidgety — than are others.

You can burn more calories with:

  • Regular aerobic exercise. Aerobic exercise is the most efficient way to burn calories and includes activities such as walking, bicycling and swimming. As a general goal, include at least 30 minutes of physical activity in your daily routine. If you want to lose weight or meet specific fitness goals, you may need to increase the time you spend on physical activity even more. If you can't set aside time for a longer workout, try 10-minute chunks of activity throughout the day. Remember, the more active you are, the greater the benefits.
  • Strength training. Strength training exercises, such as weightlifting, are important because they help counteract muscle loss associated with aging. And since muscle tissue burns more calories than fat tissue does, muscle mass is a key factor in weight loss.
  • Lifestyle activities. Any extra movement helps burn calories. Look for ways to walk and move around a few minutes more each day than the day before. Taking the stairs more often and parking farther away at the store are simple ways to burn more calories. Even activities such as gardening, washing your car and housework burn calories and contribute to weight loss.
http://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-living/weight-loss/in-depth/metabolism/art-20046508?pg=2
 
  • #4
Thanks for the replies...

I guess what I'm trying to find out is an answer to a more specific question.

In physics, if you move an object with a specific weight (175 lbs in my example) at a specific rate (6 mph in my example), there is a specific energy requirement.

Energy is measured in joules, and a calorie is just a certain amount of joules... Therefore, I would say that both subjects in the example would burn the same amount of calories regardless of how fast their hearts are beating.

But this is in conflict with things like heart rate monitors that tell you how many calories you have burned during your workout based on your heart rate.

So... do the athlete and the couch potato (who weigh the same) burn the same amount of calories after the 10 minute mile or don't they? Their hearts were beating at much different rates, but the energy requirement (calories burned) seems like it should be the same.
 
  • #5
So the question you want to ask is whether a fit individual is more efficient than a non-fit individual.

I suspect the answer is yes.

EDIT: But now that I think about it, that might just be a conclusion that results from a circular definition.
 
  • #7
I understand that an athlete will have a higher metabolism than a non-athlete. And if they were each sitting on a couch next to each other, the athlete would burn more calories while they're both resting based on metabolism alone.

But what happens with calorie burn when they both run 6 mph for 10 minutes (remembering that they weigh the same)? And how is it related to heart rate?

Are we saying that, since the athlete has a higher metabolism, he will burn more calories?

Further, if each of them were wearing a heart rate monitor that estimated their calorie burn, would this device be in agreement with that idea?

It seems to me that the non-athlete would have a much higher heart rate than the athlete during this event, and his heart rate monitor would tell him that he burned more calories than the athlete did.

Both of these ideas can't be correct.
 
  • #8
The answer is in the link I gave you, muscle burns more calories. You are referring to one person as an athlete, so I would assume that you are inferring that the athlete has more muscle than the *couch potato*. A heart rate monitor cannot tell the difference between the two people and could not give you an accurate estimate of calories burned.
 
  • #9
"In physics, if you move an object with a specific weight (175 lbs in my example) at a specific rate (6 mph in my example), there is a specific energy requirement.

Reference https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/heart-rate-vs-calorie-burn.802589/"

Well, no. Only accelerating an object requires energy. In theory, if you could run without raising and lowering your centre of gravity , on a flat plane you would expend little energy. I think that the heart rate required to keep up any level of activity is just a measure of your body's efficiency. i.e. fitness. I know that, when I am 'fit' my resting heart rate drops significantly.
 
  • #10
Good point... I guess gravity is the only reason we need to expend energy on a steady run in the first place.

So, what I learned from this thread is that heart rate monitors are completely useless if you're interested in calorie burn. Interesting...
 

What is the relationship between heart rate and calorie burn?

The relationship between heart rate and calorie burn is that the higher your heart rate, the more calories your body burns. This is because your heart rate is a measure of how hard your heart is working to pump blood and oxygen to your muscles, which requires energy in the form of calories.

Is heart rate the only factor that affects calorie burn?

No, heart rate is not the only factor that affects calorie burn. Other factors such as age, weight, gender, and fitness level also play a role in determining how many calories you burn during physical activity.

How can I use heart rate to track my calorie burn?

You can use a heart rate monitor or a fitness tracker to track your heart rate during physical activity. Many of these devices also have features that estimate how many calories you are burning based on your heart rate and other factors.

Does a higher heart rate always mean more calorie burn?

Not necessarily. While a higher heart rate generally means you are burning more calories, it is possible to have a high heart rate without burning a lot of calories. This can happen if you are doing an activity that is primarily cardio-focused and not engaging your muscles enough to burn a significant amount of calories.

How can I increase my heart rate and calorie burn during exercise?

To increase your heart rate and calorie burn during exercise, you can try incorporating more high-intensity activities, such as interval training or circuit training, into your workout routine. You can also increase the duration or intensity of your current workouts to challenge your body and burn more calories.

Similar threads

  • Biology and Medical
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • Biology and Chemistry Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
21
Views
24K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
6
Views
23K
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
15
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • DIY Projects
2
Replies
36
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
21
Views
806
Back
Top