Heat conduction between 2 objects

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on optimizing heat transfer between two objects by analyzing the thermal transfer coefficient and its implications on cross-sectional area. The thermal transfer coefficient is defined as watts per meter Kelvin (W/(m*K)), which indicates that longer distances slow down heat transfer even in steady-state conditions. The user explores a scenario involving a human body and a heat sink, applying Fourier's law of heat conduction to derive relationships between areas and lengths of the objects involved. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the units and principles behind thermal conduction for effective heat transfer calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fourier's law of heat conduction
  • Knowledge of thermal transfer coefficients
  • Familiarity with heat transfer concepts and units
  • Basic principles of thermodynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the application of Fourier's law in multi-object systems
  • Learn about thermal contact conductance and its implications
  • Explore methods to calculate effective thermal resistance in complex geometries
  • Investigate the impact of thermal paste on heat transfer efficiency
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, physicists, and students in thermodynamics or heat transfer fields who are looking to deepen their understanding of heat conduction principles and optimize thermal systems.

fahraynk
Messages
185
Reaction score
5
Can someone tell me if my logic is correct here.

I am trying to figure out how the cross sectional area to make the heat transfer from one object be the maximum amount of heat transfer with the minimal amount of area... I know the thermal transfer coefficient is watts per (meter*kelvin).
I find this to be odd. So firstly can someone explain to me why its watts per meter kelvin instead of watts per square meter? If it is longer heat transfers slower even in steady state?
Secondly, if it IS watts per meter Kelvin... Then what if one object is a weird shape? What if one object is say, a human body with a heat sink on your foot. What would the thickness of the human be (Assuming a thermal coefficient "average" for the human of 0.3)
And third, assuming all the above, is the below calculation correct?

Object 1 is at 37K (Kelvin), Length 15M, transfer coefficient of 0.3 W/(M*K)
Object 2 is at 0K, Length : L2 , thermal transfer: 400 W/(M*K)

$$\frac{400*A1*37K}{15}=\frac{0.3*A2*37K}{L2}$$
$$\frac{A2}{A1}=\frac{400*0.3*L2}{15}$$
 
Science news on Phys.org
fahraynk said:
I know the thermal transfer coefficient is watts per (meter*kelvin)

That is true but when used with Fourier's law of heat conduction:

q = k * A * ΔT / L

q: heat transfer [W]
k: thermal transfer coefficient of the conductor/insulator [W/(mK)]
A: contact area [m2]
ΔT: temperature difference from heat source to heat sink [K]
L: length of material between heat source and heat sink [m]

the units will be consistent. And hopefully make more intuitive sense.

Fourier's law applies to a 3-object system (ideal heat source, conductor/insulator, and ideal heat sink). A 2-object system is a different matter.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_contact_conductance
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fahraynk
When I think of it as dT/dx it makes a bit more sense. I guess if L is large the temperature gradient has more time to change and thus changes slower, so that will slow down heat transfer since the difference in temperature would be lower between any differential distance.

That link you gave is interesting... for the purposes of sanity I will ignore interstitial materials and pressure and just assume thermal paste between the junction!
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K