Heat equation: partial differential equations

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the heat equation represented as ut = kuxx, with initial conditions u(x,0) = x² and uxxx(x,0) = 0. The participant demonstrates that uxxx(x,t) satisfies the equation and proposes that the solution u(x,t) can be expressed in the form A(t)x² + B(t)x + C(t). The challenge arises in determining whether uxxx(x,t) can be considered identically zero and how to derive A(t), B(t), and C(t) from the initial conditions provided, noting the absence of boundary conditions in the problem statement.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of partial differential equations (PDEs)
  • Familiarity with the heat equation and its properties
  • Knowledge of initial and boundary conditions in PDEs
  • Basic calculus, particularly differentiation and integration
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of solutions for the heat equation using separation of variables
  • Learn about the implications of initial and boundary conditions in PDEs
  • Explore the concept of uniqueness in solutions of PDEs
  • Investigate the role of higher-order derivatives in the context of PDEs
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and engineers interested in the application of partial differential equations, particularly those working with heat transfer and diffusion processes.

timjones007
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
solve the heat equation
ut = kuxx

-infinity < x < infinity and 0 < t < infinity

with u(x,0)= x2 and uxxx(x,0)= 0

first i showed that uxxx(x,t) solves the equation (easy part)

the next step is to conclude that u(x,t) must be of the form A(t)x2 + B(t)x + C(t).
i tried to do this by integrating uxxx(x,t) with respect to x and i got uxx(x,t) + A(t). then i solved for uxx(x,t), integrated it with respect to x, and so on until i got u(x,t) = (triple integral of uxxx(x,t) with respect to x) + A(t)x2/2 - B(t)x - C(t).

It seems like the only way to get rid of the uxxx(x,t) is to say that it is identically equal to 0 since uxxx(x,0)= 0. Then i can get the desired form of the solution. But, can you say that uxxx(x,t) is identically equal to 0?

Once I show that A(t)x2 + B(t)x + C(t) is the form of the equation, I'm supposed to use the initial conditions to find A(t), B(t), and C(t). But, the initial conditions will only tell me what A(0), B(0), and C(0) are.That's another problem

and lastly, this may have little to do with the problem but if u(x,0)= x2 then does it mean that ux(x,0)= 2x just by differentiating both sides with respect to x or are there special conditions that must be satisfied?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure you posted the problem correctly? You need two boundary conditions and one initial condition. You've posted two initial conditions and no boundary conditions. Huh?
 
yes that's the all that's give in the problem. there's no boundary conditions
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K