Heat Transfer Q&A: Sun, Metal Heat Sinks, & Conductivity

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter RobA
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Heat Heat transfer
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the principles of heat transfer and conductivity, specifically regarding the use of metal heat sinks to absorb solar energy. It establishes that while larger copper heat sinks can absorb more energy due to increased surface area, they also lose more heat to the environment, resulting in similar equilibrium temperatures across different sizes. The conversation highlights the distinction between heat conductivity and heating capacity, noting that copper is more conductive than aluminum, but aluminum has a higher heating capacity. The thickness of the metal also influences heat transfer, with thinner plates generally being more effective.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of heat transfer principles
  • Knowledge of thermal conductivity and heating capacity
  • Familiarity with materials like copper and aluminum
  • Basic concepts of thermal equilibrium
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the thermal conductivity of various metals, focusing on copper and aluminum
  • Explore the concept of thermal equilibrium in heat transfer systems
  • Investigate the impact of surface area on heat absorption and loss
  • Learn about the design considerations for effective heat sinks in solar applications
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, physicists, and anyone involved in thermal management or solar energy applications will benefit from this discussion, particularly those looking to optimize heat transfer using metal conductors.

RobA
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm working on a project and would like some help regarding heat transfer and heat conductivity. Any help would be appreciated, I'm more or less a layman.

If I wanted to use heat from the sun to heat water via a metal conductor, does the size of the heat sink have proportional heating capacity?

For example, would a copper square measuring one square meter get significantly hotter then a copper square measuring one square foot, due to the increased surface area, and thus more heat radiation collects in the metal? IF so, would that increase proportionally? Would a copper square measuring one square mile increase in temperature in proportion to it's size (I assume at least until it reached the melting point of copper)?

second part, I understand heat conductivity, but what is heating capacity, as it relates to heat transfer? Copper is more conductive then aluminum, but aluminum has a higher heating capacity. Which would be the best metal to choose if I wanted to transfer heat from the sun, to a liquid? And would the thickness of the metal heat sink make a difference? I.e. would a copper square measuring one square meter and 1/4" thick transfer more heat then a copper square measuring one square meter and 1" thick?Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Science news on Phys.org
The equilibrium temperature depends on both heat absorbed and heat lost to the environment.
The heat lost to the environment is also proportional to the area of the metal plate.
So the answer should be no. Think that you have two separate plates of equal area, heated by the sun in the same conditions.The fact that you put them in contact along one of the edges to make a plate of twice the area won't double the temperature.
Or consider the surface of the Earth (the hemisphere facing the Sun). How much hotter do you think it gets, compared with the temperature of 1 square meter of ground in the back yard?
 
Just to get things started, I'll tackle the easy one.:smile:
Regarding the different sizes, the temperature is related to the amount of energy gained minus the amount of energy lost. A larger plate will gain more energy than a smaller one but will also lose more energy, both due to the larger surface area. The end result is they will be at the same temperature.

As an additionally bit of info, as the temperature difference between a plate (or anything else) and the ambient increases, the rate of energy transferred from the high-temperature item to the low-temperature item increases.

Oh, I see nasu got in here as I was typing... with a more intuitive comment at that!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K