Heat Transferred to a Falling Object

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the energy transferred as heat to a falling object, specifically an ice cube dropped from 30,000 feet. The formula used is Work = (Drag Force) x (Displacement), leading to the conclusion that the gravitational potential energy (U = mgh) is approximately 90 joules or 20 calories. However, this energy is insufficient to melt the ice cube, which requires 80 calories to completely transition from solid to liquid. Factors such as air temperature and density at altitude, as well as heat transfer coefficients, significantly influence the outcome.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational potential energy (U = mgh)
  • Knowledge of specific heat capacity of water (H2O)
  • Familiarity with heat transfer principles
  • Basic concepts of atmospheric science, including temperature and density variations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the specific heat capacity of ice and water for phase change calculations
  • Learn about heat transfer coefficients in fluid dynamics
  • Investigate atmospheric temperature profiles at various altitudes
  • Explore the effects of drag force on falling objects in different mediums
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, engineering, and atmospheric sciences, particularly those interested in thermodynamics and heat transfer analysis.

Comeback City
Messages
417
Reaction score
68
If I was attempting to calculate the amount of energy transferred as heat to an object free-falling in the atmosphere, is this how I could go about it?...

Work = (Drag Force) x (Displacement through atmosphere) = Energy transferred as Heat

I am attempting to solve a hypothetical question which goes, if a small ice cube is dropped from 30,000 feet in the air, will it melt before it hits the ground? After finding the energy transferred to the ice cube, I would calculate the amount of energy (using specific heat of H2O) required to both raise the temperature of the ice to 0 degrees and then to change the phase of the ice to liquid water, and compare it to the amount of energy transferred from the fall. Does this process seem to check out?
 
Science news on Phys.org
No, because the air can heat up rather than the ice cube getting heated.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Charles Link said:
No, because the air can heat up rather than the ice cube getting heated.
Thanks for the response!
Is there a way to tell whether or not the air would heat up rather than the ice cube heating up? If not, is there a way to solve this problem?
 
There is one additional complicating factor, in that, if there is evaporation that takes place from the liquid converting to gas, the result is 540 calories/gram. In general, the ice cube problem, in my estimation, does not have a simple solution. ## \\ ## Clearly, without even calculating it, the change in gravitational potential is enough to completely vaporize the ice cube, but whether it results in air getting heated and/or in kinetic energy of the ice cube is another matter. ## \\ ## Scratch this last statement: Let's compute it: ## U=mgh ## , ## h=30,000 ## ft ## \approx 9,000 ## meters, ## g=9.8 ## m/sec^2 , and ##m=1 ## gram ## =.001 ## kg . ## U=mgh=90 ## joules ## \approx 20 ## calories (1 calorie=4.184 joules). The answer is you can not even melt it with all of the available energy. You need ## 80 ## calories to completely melt it with 100% energy going into heating of the ice cube.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Comeback City
Thanks for the help!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link
The cube passes through the atmosphere in dropping the 30000 ft, and can exchange heat with the surrounding atmospheric air, since its temperature is going to differ from that of the air. Do you know what the air temperature and density are at 30000 ft, and as a function of altitude? Do you know how to determine the heat transfer coefficient between the air an the object, at the terminal velocity of the object? This is all covered in courses in heat transfer and atmospheric science.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link
@Chestermiller Thank you. Yes, that is another part of the analysis that requires careful inspection. It can make a big difference if the atmosphere is at near freezing temperatures, or at temperatures in the ## T=20^o ## to ## 30^o ## C range.
 
Charles Link said:
@Chestermiller Thank you. Yes, that is another part of the analysis that requires careful inspection. It can make a big difference if the atmosphere is at near freezing temperatures, or at temperatures in the ## T=20^o ## to ## 30^o ## C range.
Actually, at 30000 ft (10 km, base of the stratosphere), the temperatures are on the order of -50 C.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Comeback City and Charles Link

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
14K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K