Insights Blog
-- Browse All Articles --
Physics Articles
Physics Tutorials
Physics Guides
Physics FAQ
Math Articles
Math Tutorials
Math Guides
Math FAQ
Education Articles
Education Guides
Bio/Chem Articles
Technology Guides
Computer Science Tutorials
Forums
General Math
Calculus
Differential Equations
Topology and Analysis
Linear and Abstract Algebra
Differential Geometry
Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Trending
Featured Threads
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
General Math
Calculus
Differential Equations
Topology and Analysis
Linear and Abstract Algebra
Differential Geometry
Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Mathematics
Topology and Analysis
Heine-Borel Theorem in R^n .... Stromberg, Theorem 3.40 .... ....
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Math Amateur, post: 6776071, member: 203675"] Thanks for the help, HallsofIvy ... ... You write: " ... ... [COLOR=#333333][FONT=Verdana]No, that is not correct. In fact, it doesn't make sense. To talk about a "subcover" you must first have specified a "cover". Are you talking about the one given in the argument ... "Yes, I was talking about [/FONT][/COLOR][MATH]\mathscr{U} = \{ B_k (0) \ : \ k \in \mathbb{N} \}[/MATH] as given by Stromberg ... but I did not say so explicitly ... so strictly speaking ... yes ... what I said was not correct ... indeed reading literally ... it didn't make sense ... as you say ... Thanks again ... Peter [COLOR=#333333][FONT=Verdana][/FONT][/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Post reply
Forums
Mathematics
Topology and Analysis
Heine-Borel Theorem in R^n .... Stromberg, Theorem 3.40 .... ....
Back
Top