Help Analyzing Circuit Using Ideal Diode Method

  • Context: Engineering 
  • Thread starter Thread starter solomon684
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit Diode Method
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around analyzing a circuit using the ideal diode model, specifically focusing on the behavior of diodes D1 and D2 under different assumptions. Participants explore the implications of these assumptions on current and voltage values, and how they affect the circuit's operation.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that the assumption of D1 being off and D2 being on leads to confusion regarding the voltage across D1, questioning why vD1 = +7V contradicts this assumption.
  • Another participant explains that the potential difference causing D1 to turn on is derived from the voltage divider effect in the circuit.
  • A participant questions the calculation of vD2, suggesting it should be -7V instead of -3V, and seeks clarification on the assumptions regarding D2's state.
  • It is discussed that the assumption about D2 being off is correct because its cathode is at a higher potential than its anode, making it reverse biased.
  • One participant inquires whether current values can also invalidate assumptions, leading to a discussion about the relationship between current and voltage in determining diode states.
  • Another participant emphasizes that incorrect current assumptions can lead to erroneous potential calculations throughout the circuit.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty regarding the assumptions made about the diodes and the resulting voltage calculations. There is no clear consensus on the implications of current versus voltage in determining diode behavior.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific circuit diagrams and calculations but do not fully resolve the discrepancies in voltage values or assumptions about diode states. The discussion remains exploratory, with various interpretations of the circuit behavior.

solomon684
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hey guys, I see this website a lot when lot when looking for help so I made an account since I cannot find help with this problem anywhere.

Homework Statement


Use the ideal diode model to analyze the circuit below (circuit (a) in the attachment). Start by assuming D1 is off and D2 is on.

Homework Equations


Ohm's law, Voltage-division principle


The Attempt at a Solution


The textbook has the answer (Electrical Engineering Principles and Applications 5th Edition, by Hambley, Example 10.5) but I do not understand it. The answer they have is the second attachment, and the circuits are in the first one.

I am having trouble with a few simple things. I understand that iD2 = 0.5mA from Ohms law, but cannot figure out why vD1 = +7V. With both those values, I am unsure why the first assumption (D1 off, D2 on), is incorrect, and why the fact that vD1 = +7V not consistent with the first assumption?

From there, how did they solve for vD2 = -3V with the second assumption (D1 on, D2 off), and why is that consistent with the assumption? I feel like this is a simple question but for some reason I find this confusing. Thanks for the help.
 

Attachments

  • Ideal Diodes.png
    Ideal Diodes.png
    18.9 KB · Views: 864
  • Solution.png
    Solution.png
    52.7 KB · Views: 672
Physics news on Phys.org
solomon684 said:
Hey guys, I see this website a lot when lot when looking for help so I made an account since I cannot find help with this problem anywhere.

Homework Statement


Use the ideal diode model to analyze the circuit below (circuit (a) in the attachment). Start by assuming D1 is off and D2 is on.

Homework Equations


Ohm's law, Voltage-division principle


The Attempt at a Solution


The textbook has the answer (Electrical Engineering Principles and Applications 5th Edition, by Hambley, Example 10.5) but I do not understand it. The answer they have is the second attachment, and the circuits are in the first one.

I am having trouble with a few simple things. I understand that iD2 = 0.5mA from Ohms law, but cannot figure out why vD1 = +7V. With both those values, I am unsure why the first assumption (D1 off, D2 on), is incorrect, and why the fact that vD1 = +7V not consistent with the first assumption?

From there, how did they solve for vD2 = -3V with the second assumption (D1 on, D2 off), and why is that consistent with the assumption? I feel like this is a simple question but for some reason I find this confusing. Thanks for the help.

Hi solomon684, welcome to PF.

An ideal diode conducts (ON) when it is forward biased, and behaves as an open circuit (OFF) when it is reverse biased. If the circuit wants to cause a current to flow in the direction of the diode's arrow, then that diode will turn on.

In figure B the potential at the top of the 6kΩ resistor (with respect to the bottom node) is 3V. The potential at the open end of the 4kΩ is the same as that of the 10V battery, or 10V. Thus the potential difference between the two points is 10V - 3V = 7V. The circuit would "like" to push current from the 10V point to the 3V point.

Since a 7V forward potential would want to make diode 1 turn on, the assumption that the diode is off is incorrect.
 
Ok got it, that makes much more sense, but then why is vD2 -3V? Wouldn't it be 3V - 10V = -7V?

And then what is it that makes that assumption correct? I cannot seem to figure this portion out. It seems like the negative voltage would make the current go left, turning on D2 and making the assumption incorrect. Obviously that is wrong but I am unsure why.
 
solomon684 said:
Ok got it, that makes much more sense, but then why is vD2 -3V? Wouldn't it be 3V - 10V = -7V?
Referring to figure (C), the potential at the top of the 6kΩ resistor is determined by the voltage divider action of the 10V battery, the 4kΩ resistor, and that 6kΩ resistor. The result is that there is +6V at the top of that resistor. So the cathode of the diode has +6V and the anode +3V. Note the defined polarity of Vd is the potential from anode to cathode. That makes Vd = 3V - 6V = -3V.
[/QUOTE]
And then what is it that makes that assumption correct? I cannot seem to figure this portion out. It seems like the negative voltage would make the current go left, turning on D2 and making the assumption incorrect. Obviously that is wrong but I am unsure why.[/QUOTE]

The assumption is correct because it doesn't introduce any contradictions in the circuit behavior. Since the cathode of D2 is at a higher potential than its anode, it is reverse biased and no current will flow through it. D1 on the other hand has a forward bias provided by the 10V battery.
 
gneill said:
Referring to figure (C), the potential at the top of the 6kΩ resistor is determined by the voltage divider action of the 10V battery, the 4kΩ resistor, and that 6kΩ resistor. The result is that there is +6V at the top of that resistor. So the cathode of the diode has +6V and the anode +3V. Note the defined polarity of Vd is the potential from anode to cathode. That makes Vd = 3V - 6V = -3V.

The assumption is correct because it doesn't introduce any contradictions in the circuit behavior. Since the cathode of D2 is at a higher potential than its anode, it is reverse biased and no current will flow through it. D1 on the other hand has a forward bias provided by the 10V battery.
Ohhhhh okay I see now. In the first example (diagram (b)) the anode was 10V while the cathode was 3V, so it would be forward bias with current flowing through, so the diode would be on, meaning the assumption that it is off is incorrect.

Just a question though, is there ever a time when the value of the current would make an assumption incorrect, or does it only have to do with the voltage potential?
 
solomon684 said:
Just a question though, is there ever a time when the value of the current would make an assumption incorrect, or does it only have to do with the voltage potential?

The open circuit potential across a diode location is usually diagnostic if the rest of the assumptions are made correctly. It's hard to say what effects a wrong assumption could have in a complex circuit. Current assumed flowing where it shouldn't can alter potentials here and there throughout the circuit. Incorrect currents can lead to incorrect potential calculations.
 
gneill said:
The open circuit potential across a diode location is usually diagnostic if the rest of the assumptions are made correctly. It's hard to say what effects a wrong assumption could have in a complex circuit. Current assumed flowing where it shouldn't can alter potentials here and there throughout the circuit. Incorrect currents can lead to incorrect potential calculations.
Alright cool, thank you very much for your help. I appreciate it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
16K