What is the magnitude of angular acceleration upon release?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the angular acceleration of a dumbbell consisting of two point masses (12 kg and 6 kg) attached to a negligible mass rod, pivoted at its center. The user initially struggles with determining the moment of inertia (I) and the correct application of torque. After some calculations, they derive the angular acceleration (alpha) as 13.1 radians/sec². It is clarified that the position of the center of mass can be considered, but it does not significantly affect the outcome in this scenario. The final consensus confirms the calculated angular acceleration is correct.
justagirl
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
A dumbbell consists of a slender rod of negligible mass and small spheres attached to each end with mass 12-kg and 6-kg respectively. It is pivoted at its center about a fixed horizontal frictionless axle and initially held in place horizontally. The length of the rod is 50 centimeters and connects the centers of the two spheres. The dumbell is then released.

What is the magnitude of angular acceleration immediately upon release?

I wrote down torque = I(alpha)
alpha = torque / I = 12(0.5) - 6(0.5) / I

I am stuck here. And what would "I" be in this case since the rod is neglible mass and we don't know the radius of the spheres?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
justagirl said:
I am stuck here. And what would "I" be in this case since the rod is neglible mass and we don't know the radius of the spheres?
Treat the spheres as point masses. What's the rotational inertia of a point mass fixed a certain distance from an axis?
 
Okay... treating them as point masses:

alpha = torque / I

= (m1)gr - (m2)gr / m1(r^2) + m2(r^2)

= 12(9.8)(0.25) - 6(9.8)(0.25) / ((.25^2) (m1 + m2))

= 13.1

Is that right? So the position of the center of mass doesn't really matter in this case?

Thanks!
 
justagirl said:
= 13.1

Is that right?
Yes, in units of radians/sec^2.
So the position of the center of mass doesn't really matter in this case?
I'm not sure what you mean. If you had wished, you could have calculated the torque by considering the mass as concentrated at the center of mass.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
13K