Help Covariant Derivative of Ricci Tensor the hard way.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the covariant derivative of the Ricci Tensor, specifically using methods akin to those employed by Einstein. The user presents two expressions for the covariant derivative, highlighting issues with index notation. A key insight is the suggestion to utilize the second Bianchi identity to derive the result, while emphasizing the historical context of Einstein's approach, which lacked modern tools like symbolic algebra programs.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of covariant derivatives in differential geometry
  • Familiarity with the Ricci Tensor and its properties
  • Knowledge of index notation and tensor calculus
  • Basic grasp of the Bianchi identities in Riemannian geometry
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Ricci Tensor from the Riemann curvature tensor
  • Learn about the second Bianchi identity and its applications
  • Explore historical methods of tensor calculus as used by Einstein
  • Investigate symbolic algebra tools for modern tensor calculations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students of general relativity who are interested in the historical methods of tensor calculus and the derivation of curvature tensors.

nobraner
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I am trying to calculate the covariant derivative of the Ricci Tensor the way Einstein did it, but I keep coming up with

\nabla_{μ}R_{αβ}=\frac{∂}{∂x^{μ}}R_{αβ}-2\Gamma^{α}_{μ\gamma}R_{αβ}

or


\nabla_{μ}R_{αβ}=\frac{∂}{∂x^{μ}}R_{αβ}-\Gamma^{α}_{μ\gamma}R_{αβ}-\Gamma^{β}_{μ\gamma}R_{αβ}

Any help will be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your second expression is almost right, except you have some trouble with indices. If alpha and beta are free indices on the left, you should not use them as summation indices on the right. Use gamma as your summation index, and then alpha and beta should remain free indices.
 
Then, how did Einstein get

\nabla_{μ}R_{αβ}=\frac{1}{2}g_{αβ}\nabla_{μ}R
 
Try the second Bianchi identity, contract it twice and you get the result.
 
Thanks for the advice, but anyone can do it that way. I'm trying to do it the way Einstein did it; the hard way. Einstein didn't know about the Bianchi Identities.
 
You can put the definition of the Ricci and scalar curvature tensor in term of metric...
 
Einstein didn't have symbolic algebra programs, I would guess. But that's what I'd use.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K