Help identifying these early American Indian tools please

  • Thread starter Thread starter dlgoff
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tools
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the identification of early American Indian tools, specifically a stone tool found alongside arrowheads in Arkansas. Participants explore various hypotheses regarding the tool's purpose, including its potential uses for scraping, as a pestle, or as a hoe. The conversation also touches on the context of the find and the possibility of contacting experts for further insights.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests the tool may have been used for scraping, while another proposes it could serve as a pestle for milling corn.
  • There are multiple guesses regarding the tool's identity, including a hoe or a small digging implement for planting seeds.
  • A participant shares personal experience with similar items made by a neighbor, indicating that context is crucial for identifying archaeological materials.
  • Some participants consider the possibility that the tool could be a bannerstone, although one notes that their item lacks a hole typically associated with such artifacts.
  • Another participant speculates that the tool might be a grooved axe or a miniature version, based on further research.
  • Discussion includes the potential for the tool to be a net sinker, depending on the historical context of water bodies in the area.
  • One participant mentions the historical periods of Native American artifacts in Arkansas, suggesting that dating the artifacts could provide insights into their uses.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of hypotheses without reaching a consensus on the tool's identity or purpose. Multiple competing views remain, and the discussion is unresolved regarding the exact nature of the artifacts.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of context, such as the exact location and depth where the artifacts were found, which may influence their identification. There are references to historical periods of Native American artifacts that could provide additional context for understanding the tools.

dlgoff
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,441
Reaction score
3,265
I was looking through my arrow heads so I could add another row on this board: https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/img_3670-jpg.290343/
and found this tool?:
IMG_3685-2.jpg

I'm not sure what it was used for, maybe for scraping? It was found with the arrowheads in Arkansas.

Also found there was this, what I think it is an American Indian stone stick ball (edit: I measured it's diameter at just about 3.5 cm), but not sure what it is:
GameBall.jpg


Anyone have any knowledge of these? Thanks for any help.
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
I have no knowledge, but I might use that first one as a pestle - for example, for milling corn.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: dlgoff
Another WAG (Wild A** Guess), for the first one my wife suggested a hoe. The groove near the top edge could be wear from a binding to a stick.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dlgoff
Tom.G said:
for the first one my wife suggested a hoe. The groove near the top edge could be wear from a binding to a stick.
Yes, it does look like it could be a hoe albeit a small one; it measures about 3.5 cm in length with the widest blade side at about 3 cm. Please thank your wife for me.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tom.G
3.5cm?? Well, maybe if they had a Bonsai garden. :oldbiggrin:

edit:
OK, a recovery attempt. A hoe to dig a small hole to plant individual seeds (beans maybe)?

I we will quit now... this is getting too far out.
[/size]
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: dlgoff
Context (exact location and depth, for example) is everything when it comes to identifying archeological materials. I live in New Mexico. One of my neighbors on the reservation where we lived made items very like the stone in the first picture. He "aged" the stone in sheep dung + water + lime for about six weeks. I think they were sold at Wrights Indian Art in Albuquerque back in the 1980's. Henry Rosetta made some with turquoise inlay.

I am not asserting anything wrong. Those can be real artifacts - have no way to help decide.

My guess: it is like a bannerstone - see this page:

https://collections.gilcrease.org/s...ndle:collection&f[2]=im_field_department:1389
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Oldman too
jim mcnamara said:
Context (exact location and depth, for example) is everything when it comes to identifying archeological materials. I live in New Mexico. One of my neighbors on the reservation where we lived made items very like the stone in the first picture. He "aged" the stone in sheep dung + water + lime for about six weeks. I think they were sold at Wrights Indian Art in Albuquerque back in the 1980's. Henry Rosetta made some with turquoise inlay.

jim mcnamara said:
I am not asserting anything wrong. Those can be real artifacts - have no way to help decide.

My guess: it is like a bannerstone - see this page:

https://collections.gilcrease.org/search/site/?f[0]=bundle:museum_object&f[1]=bundle:collection&f[2]=im_field_department:1389
I've never heard of a bannerstone before. The thing I have has no hole in it like in your link. Later, I'll post an image with the exact location and depth, etc. measurements. Thanks for helping me figure this one out.

edit: this stone was definitely found in Arkansas with the other arrowheads I've shown. So it's not from an antique store and certainly not from Albuquerque.
 
dlgoff said:
It was found with the arrowheads in Arkansas.
Just based on that context and the size, maybe it's to be fixed on a short stick to peck those arrowheads?
Kind of ancestor of all jewelry hammers o0)

Ps.: after some googlework, grooved axes, 'miniature' edition
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: dlgoff
Contact U of Arkansas Anthropology. Try Wes Stoner.


University of Arkansas
Department of Anthropology
330 Old Main
Fayetteville, AR 72701
wdstoner@uark.edu

Try a simple contact asking for a reference to faculty who know about pre-Columbian artifacts.

If you get a response, forward your nice pictures and location data to that person. Might be Wes.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Oldman too, BillTre, dlgoff and 1 other person
  • #10
jim mcnamara said:
Contact U of Arkansas Anthropology. Try Wes Stoner.


University of Arkansas
Department of Anthropology
330 Old Main
Fayetteville, AR 72701
wdstoner@uark.edu

Try a simple contact asking for a reference to faculty who know about pre-Columbian artifacts.

If you get a response, forward your nice pictures and location data to that person. Might be Wes.
I'll give that a try. Thank you for this contact info. I'll let you know here when I am able to make contact.
 
  • #11
Rive said:
Ps.: after some googlework, grooved axes, 'miniature' edition
More information. Nice. This could be it.
 
  • #12
Rive said:
Just based on that context and the size, maybe it's to be fixed on a short stick to peck those arrowheads?
Kind of ancestor of all jewelry hammers o0)

Ps.: after some googlework, grooved axes, 'miniature' edition
Using this, I did a little more googleing and found these notched stone net sinkers. They look similar:
small NetSinkers-Figure1.jpg


Size is good also.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman, Rive and BillTre
  • #13
dlgoff said:
Using this, I did a little more googleing and found these notched stone net sinkers. They look similar:
Depending on the area (was there some water bodies in the area?) this would be a more fitting explanation than a tool (for a tool, there would be chipping on the edge).
 
  • #14
Rive said:
Depending on the area (was there some water bodies in the area?) this would be a more fitting explanation than a tool (for a tool, there would be chipping on the edge).
It and the arrowheads were found near Cave City, Arkansas and there are no bodies of water that I know about. But the last time I was there was 50 or 60 years ago. Here's what Wikipedia says about Cave City:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cave_City,_Arkansas

edit- this is one thing they write about water:
Cave City is located at 35°56′53″N 91°33′3″W (35.948087, -91.550952).[5] The town is centered on, and partially located above, the https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Crystal_River_(Arkansas)&action=edit&redlink=1, an underground body of water located in the multi-room https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Crystal_River_Cave&action=edit&redlink=1, for which the town is named. The beginning and ending of the water source has never been determined.
 
  • #15
I've just checked the map and it's not some arid area and there are some smaller lakes and creeks there. Likely (?) there was water around in the past too.
So presence of fishing tools is indeed a possibility.
I would say you just nailed it:smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and dlgoff
  • #16
Rive said:
I would say you just nailed it
I think so too. Thanks for your help.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Rive
  • #17
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Oldman too, Greg Bernhardt, BillTre and 2 others
  • #18
dlgoff said:
I'll give that a try. Thank you for this contact info. I'll let you know here when I am able to make contact.
@jim mcnamara

I think I've figured out what it is, so won't have to make this contact.
 
Last edited:
  • #19
jim mcnamara said:
Try Wes Stoner.

Sounds like the perfect person to look at rocks. . . . :-p
.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Oldman too, dlgoff and BillTre
  • #20
@dlgoff , I was checking the Wikipedia entries for the history of Arkansas and it mentions several historical periods for Native American artifacts, including the following:

1. The Archaic period, roughly corresponding to 8000 BC to 1000 BC

2. The Woodland period, roughly corresponding from 1000 BC to 1000 CE

3. The Mississippian culture, roughly corresponding from 1000CE to early European contact

It would be interesting to determine roughly when the artifacts you've identified can be dated to, as that would determine what purposes these tools were used for. Archaeologists at the University of Arkansas may be of assistance.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: dlgoff
  • #21
StatGuy2000 said:
@dlgoff , I was checking the Wikipedia entries for the history of Arkansas and it mentions several historical periods for Native American artifacts, including the following:

1. The Archaic period, roughly corresponding to 8000 BC to 1000 BC

2. The Woodland period, roughly corresponding from 1000 BC to 1000 CE

3. The Mississippian culture, roughly corresponding from 1000CE to early European contact

It would be interesting to determine roughly when the artifacts you've identified can be dated to, as that would determine what purposes these tools were used for. Archaeologists at the University of Arkansas may be of assistance.
It would be interesting. Thanks for the info. I've got a lot going on right now, but will make contact with the University of Arkansas when I am free to do so.
 
  • #22
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dlgoff and berkeman
  • #25
dlgoff said:
Thanks for the link. I don't see anywhere the rocks can be seen though.

Yes, just pictures of the people and the canoe as I recall.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: dlgoff

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
20K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
855
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K