Undergrad Why are the numbers switched around in this partial differential problem?

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a partial differential equation related to damping oscillations, specifically the equation m\ddot x + 2c \dot x + m\omega^2 x = 0. A participant seeks clarification on why certain numbers appear switched in their solution, particularly regarding the square root term. It is explained that if c^2 < m^2ω^2, the square root becomes complex, introducing an 'i' factor that was missing in the original post. This oversight led to confusion, but it was resolved through clarification. The exchange highlights the importance of accurate representation in mathematical proofs.
Kajan thana
Messages
149
Reaction score
18
TL;DR
changing signs with given equality.
I am going through some proofs for Damping oscillations in relation to partial differentials. Can someone help on why the numbers are switched around after giving inequality condition? Please see the images for better clarity. The highlighted characters that gets switched around.

Thank you in advance.
 

Attachments

  • Maths1.jpeg
    Maths1.jpeg
    33.1 KB · Views: 215
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I feel there's some missing context.

It looks like you're triny to solve <br /> m\ddot x + 2c \dot x + m\omega^2 x = 0. The solution to this is <br /> x(t) = Ae^{\lambda_{+}t} + Be^{\lambda_{-}t} where <br /> \lambda_{\pm} = - \frac cm \pm \sqrt{\frac{c^2}{m^2} - \omega^2}. Now iif c^2 \geq m^2 \omega^2 then that's fine as it stands, because the quantity under the square root is positive and you'll get a real result.

Otherwise, the quantity under the square root is negative and you get a complex result, which you can write as <br /> \pm\sqrt{ \frac{c^2}{m^2} - \omega^2} = \pm\sqrt{-\left(\omega^2 - \frac{c^2}{m^2}\right)} = \pm i \sqrt{\omega^2 - \frac{c^2}{m^2}} where i^2 = -1. Thus if c^2 &lt; m^2 \omega^2 you have <br /> \lambda_{\pm} = -\frac{c}{m} \pm i \sqrt{ \omega^2 - \frac{c^2}{m^2}}. For some reason the factor of i in front of the square root is missing from what you have posted.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Delta2 and Kajan thana
pasmith said:
I feel there's some missing context.

It looks like you're triny to solve <br /> m\ddot x + 2c \dot x + m\omega^2 x = 0. The solution to this is <br /> x(t) = Ae^{\lambda_{+}t) + Be^{\lambda_{-}t where <br /> \lambda_{\pm} = - \frac cm \pm \sqrt{\frac{c^2}{m^2} - \omega^2}. Now iif c^2 \geq m^2 \omega^2 then that's fine as it stands, because the quantity under the square root is positive and you'll get a real result.

Otherwise, the quantity under the square root is negative and you get a complex result, which you can write as <br /> \pm\sqrt{ \frac{c^2}{m^2} - \omega^2} = \pm\sqrt{-\left(\omega^2 - \frac{c^2}{m^2}\right)} = \pm i \sqrt{\omega^2 - \frac{c^2}{m^2}} where i^2 = -1. Thus if c^2 &lt; m^2 \omega^2 you have <br /> \lambda_{\pm} = -\frac{c}{m} \pm i \sqrt{ \omega^2 - \frac{c^2}{m^2}}. For some reason the factor of i in front of the square root is missing from what you have posted.
Thank you Pasmith, a small copying error that led to this misunderstanding. Thank you again for taking the time to point this out to me and explaining it clearly. You are a superstar.
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K