Help me parse the logic of this statement

  • Thread starter Poopsilon
  • Start date
  • #1
294
1
So I have this statement that I'm supposed to prove and I cannot for the life of me figure out what parts I'm allowed to assume and what part I am expected to prove, here it is:


The residue of an analytic function f at a singularity a ∈ ℂ is the uniquely determined complex number c, such that the function
[tex]f(z) - \frac{c}{z-a}[/tex]
admits a primitive in a punctured neighborhood of the point a. (end statement)


I know I'm allowed to assume that f is analytic with a singularity at a, but beyond that I just can't tell if it's a biconditional I have to prove, or if it's just a conditional and if so which way. Thanks
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
AlephZero
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
6,994
293
I think if means prove two things.

1. The residue is a uniquely determined complex number c.
2. f(x) has the property stated.
 
  • #3
294
1
Thanks for your input Aleph, but it's not the answer I want to hear lol. Can I get a second opinion?
 

Related Threads on Help me parse the logic of this statement

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
557
Replies
1
Views
684
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
893
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
704
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
Top