HELP ~ Mechanical Energy vs Potential Energy & Kinetic Energy

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating various forms of energy for a satellite in a circular orbit, specifically focusing on mechanical energy, kinetic energy, and gravitational potential energy. The problem is set in the context of an isolated system with no friction, and participants are exploring the implications of gravitational acceleration at different heights.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate kinetic energy, potential energy, and mechanical energy using provided equations and values. They express uncertainty about how to approach the calculation of height when kinetic energy is zero, questioning which value of gravitational acceleration to use at that height.

Discussion Status

Some participants affirm the methods used by the original poster, indicating that the arithmetic appears correct. There is a suggestion that using the average value of gravitational acceleration for the final part of the question may be valid. However, another participant introduces a more complex gravitational formula, prompting further exploration of gravitational effects at varying heights.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem allows for the use of an average value for gravitational acceleration, but there is also discussion about how gravity changes with height, which may affect the calculations. The original poster is seeking clarification on these assumptions and their implications for the problem.

Lexington
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
FYI: I'm new here but I'm just about done phys 20, just nearing the end of the course. We're working on calculating Work right now. More specifically calculating Mechanical Energy, Kinetic Energy and Potential Energy. I think I've pretty much got most of the equation solved, it's just one last detail I can't seem to figure out on my own. Now for the problem:

*NONE (ZERO) FRICTION (AKA ISOLATED) SYSTEM*
5. To maintain a circular orbit at a height of 180 km above Earth's surface, a satellite with a mass of 1.0 x 10^3 kg must travel at a constant speed of 7.8 km/s. Using an average value for g of 9.5 m/s^2, calculate the gravitational potential energy of the satellite, its kinetic energy, its mechanical energy, and the height it can rise to before losing all its kinetic energy.

Relevant equations
Ek = 1/2mv^2
Ep = mgh + zero
Em = Ek + Ep

Where:
Ek = Kinetic Energy
Ep = Potential Energy
Em = Mechanical Energy
m = Mass
v = Velocity
g = Gravity
h = Height (distance from Earth's surface)


Here is what I have so far. *IF THERE ARE ANY ERRORS PLEASE LET ME KNOW* Look below to see what I need help with.

h = 180 000m
m = 1.0x10^3kg
v = 7.8x10^3m/s
g = 9.5m/s^2

Ek = 1/2mv^2
= 1/2(1.0*10^3kg)(7.8x10^3m/s)^2
= 30,420,000,000
Ek = 3.0x10^10 J

The Kinetic Energy for the satellite is 3.0x10^10 J.Ep = mgh + zero
= (1.0x10^3kg)(9.5m/s^2)(180000m) + 0
= 1,710,000,000
= 1.7x10^9 J

The Gravitational Potential Energy of the satellite is 1.7x10^9 J.

Em = Ek + Ep
= (3.0x10^10 J) + (1.7x10^9 J)
= 301,700,000,000
= 3.0x10^11 J

The total Mechanical Energy for the satellite is 3.0x10^11 J.

The last part of the question asks for "the height it can rise to before losing all its kinetic energy." Now, I know that when the kinetic energy is 0 the potential energy is equal to the mechanical energy. So this is the incomplete equation I figured:

When Ek = 0
Em = 3.0x10^11 J
m = 1.0x10^3kg
g = ??

Em = Ep
= mgh
h = (Em)/(mg)
= (3.0x10^11J)/[(1.0x10^3kg)(____)

When we go farther away from earth, gravity Decreases. So evidently my input for gravity should be something else, something dependent on the height. So if not this equation, what equation should I use? Or IF this equation, what variable for gravity do I use, 9.5m/s^2?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Lexington and welcome to PF,

Firstly, I want to thank you for submitting such a detailed question and solution.

Secondly, although I haven't checked your arithmetic your methods seem correct.

Thirdly, the question states that you may use an average value for the acceleration due to gravity. Therefore, I would think it was safe to assume that it would be valid to use the averaged value of g in the final part of the question. Your formula is correct.
 
You're welcome =)

And thank you for all that you said. I really appreciate the help.
 
You should use the gravitational formula Fg=G(m1m2)/r2 where G is the gravitational constant of 6.67*10^11, Fg is the force of Gravity so divide by the mass to get acceleration, mass1 is the mass of the earth, mass two is the mass of the satelite, and r^2 is the radius from the center of the Earth squared so you take the Earth's radius and add the height of the satellite then square the sum. That should give you the closest approximation, you can also use that formula to determine escape velocity. Keep in mind the error due to air resistance and terminal velocity, but that is not important until calculus.
 
never mind what I said the 9.5m/s^2 is what they expect you to use.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K