Help Needed: Magnetic Inertial Hybrid Fusion Reactor

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of a Magnetic Inertial Confinement Hybrid Fusion Reactor design, specifically focusing on the use of Peeta Watt lasers to achieve the necessary conditions for fusion. Participants explore theoretical aspects, engineering challenges, and the current state of fusion research funding.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires whether focusing Peeta Watt lasers on plasma in a specific configuration could achieve the required temperatures and pressures for fusion ignition.
  • Another participant emphasizes the need for sources or references to support claims about the reactor design.
  • A different participant argues that simply adding energy through lasers may create disturbances in the plasma, complicating the fusion process rather than facilitating it.
  • Concerns are raised about the engineering challenges of this approach compared to existing fusion efforts, suggesting that the current focus on tokamak designs may be more viable.
  • There is mention of the limited funding for fusion research in the US, with a note on the potential for renewed interest from private investors in breakthrough technologies.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility and practicality of the proposed reactor design, with no consensus reached on whether the approach could be effective or if existing methods are preferable.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of achieving both high density and temperature for fusion, indicating that the discussion is influenced by the current state of fusion research and funding limitations.

KFM
Messages
8
Reaction score
3
Can anyone help with this please...

Would the following work?

Magnetic inertial Confinement Hybrid Fusion Reactor.

Peeta Watt lasers are focused on the plasma in the equatorial plane of the multi mega amp plasma pulse within its’ torous geometry between the center post and the merging compression coils. This creates the high temperatures and pressures required at an ignition point... a focal length distance form the laser.

Would this work, or is it necessary are the temperatures and pressures already met but the energy can not be controlled?

Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Magnetic inertial Confinement Hybrid Fusion Reactor.
 

Attachments

  • hybrid.png
    hybrid.png
    42.6 KB · Views: 549
please see image
 

Attachments

  • Magnetic confinement inertial confinement hybrid fusion reactor.png
    Magnetic confinement inertial confinement hybrid fusion reactor.png
    48 KB · Views: 543
KFM said:
Magnetic inertial Confinement Hybrid Fusion Reactor.

Where is this coming from? You need to give a link to the source.
 
This is a little too facile.
The challenge in a tokamak is to get both the density and the temperature up to the point where fusion can propagate, else one pays extra for every fusion event .
Dumping in a lot of energy via a laser beam just creates a hot spot which disturbs the plasma and complicates the task of squeezing the plasma sufficiently.
The engineering effort to make that approach functional is likely to be much greater than that needed to bring the existing work to a successful conclusion.

As an aside, the US fusion effort is already running on starvation rations, in line with the desultory international effort currently centered on ITER, so there is no money for alternate approaches. The current programs are post 2050 at best, low priority and low budget, partly perhaps because success would step on many toes. The one ray of light is that the problem is getting renewed private attention. In a world where there are centi-billionaires willing to pay for results, there may be opportunity for a breakthrough.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K