Help: Obtaining the elemental concentration using EDX analysis

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on obtaining elemental concentration from EDX analysis for atmospheric particulate studies. The process involves sampling particulates, gravimetric analysis, and using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) with Energy Dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis to determine elemental composition. However, EDX provides only atomic and weight percentages for a limited number of particles, which is insufficient for Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) analysis. The recommended alternative is to utilize Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) for more reliable quantitative results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) techniques
  • Familiarity with Energy Dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis
  • Knowledge of Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) methodology
  • Experience with Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS)
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles and applications of Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS)
  • Study the methodology of Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) for source apportionment
  • Explore the limitations and challenges of EDX analysis in quantitative measurements
  • Investigate alternative chemical analysis methods for elemental concentration determination
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in environmental science, atmospheric chemists, and analysts involved in particulate matter studies and source apportionment methodologies.

schrodingerscat11
Messages
86
Reaction score
1
Greetings!

We are currently doing a study about the elemental composition of ambient particles in the atmosphere. Basically, here's what we do:
(1) Get samples of particulates using an air sampler with known flow rate. The particulates are deposited on a filter. One filter is used per sampling.
(2) Determine the concentration of the particulates using gravimetric analysis and the flow rate of the sampler.
(3) Determine the shape and elemental composition of 24 particles (chosen randomly) per filter using Scanning Electron Microscope and Energy Dispersive Analysis.

Question: Is there a way to obtain the elemental concentration of certain elements per filter using EDX analysis and the particulate concentration? An EDX analysis yields only atomic and weight percentages per particle. And I only analyze 24 particles, a very small fraction of the total number of particles deposited on the filter.

I need to get the elemental concentration of selected elements per filter since our adviser wants us to use Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) for source apportionment. PMF needs elemental concentration per filter, not atomic/weight percentages of some particles in a filter, as input.

If the answer to the previous answer is no, is there an alternative method for source apportionment where my data can be used as inputs?

Thank you very much for your help and for reading this post.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
It sounds to me like EDX is not the method you should use, but rather some form of chemical analysis (e.g., ICP-MS). EDX is difficult to get reliable quantitiative results for a variety of reasons (i.e., lack of standards, volume sampling errors, insensitivity to low atomic number elements, etc.).
 
Hmm.. I see. Thank you very much! :)
 
I need to anneal 5052 aluminum for a home project. Google has given me mixed results on how to do this. Short version is that I'm doing some heavy forming on a piece of 5052-H32 and I'm running into issues with it work hardening. I've tried the Sharpie trick with a propane torch. But I'm not sure this is doing anything. I'm also seeing conflicting opinions whether to quench or air cool. So I'm looking for some expert opinions. (Oven heating is not an option due to size.) Thanks. edit: The...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
21K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K