Help please (concerning eigenfunctions and the Schrödinger equation)

AI Thread Summary
To confirm that a wave function is an eigenfunction of the Schrödinger equation, it must be operated on with the Hamiltonian to check if it returns the same wave function multiplied by a constant, specifically one of the energies E_n. The original post included a hard-to-read attachment of the work, which hindered clarity. A suggestion was made to provide a higher-quality scan or to use LaTeX for better readability. The feedback emphasized that the user's attempt did not directly address the eigenfunction verification process. Clear communication and proper formatting are essential for effective assistance in complex topics like quantum mechanics.
medofx
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
in the attachment
Relevant Equations
in the attachment
i have an exam in 2 days and in this question i don't know how should i proceed after that i simplified the wave function but i don't know how to confirm that it's an eigenfunction
 

Attachments

  • 67360771_498788314260240_5978405639204896768_n.jpg
    67360771_498788314260240_5978405639204896768_n.jpg
    28 KB · Views: 309
  • 20190731_015943.jpg
    20190731_015943.jpg
    14.2 KB · Views: 273
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to the PF. :smile:

Your attachment with your work is very hard to read. Can you make a higher-quality scan of it and attach that? Better yet would be for you to type your work into the forum Edit window using LaTeX -- there is a tutorial on LaTeX at the Help pages (see INFO at the top of the page). Thanks
 
hopefully this is better
 

Attachments

  • Like
Likes berkeman
medofx said:
hopefully this is better
Your attempt at a solution is not relevant to the question. To show that the given wavefunction is an eigenfunction, you need to operate on it with the Hamiltonian and see whether you get back the same wavefunction times a constant, in this case one of the energies ##E_n##.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top