Help required integrating this function over all time

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving a function that describes the probability of two-photon interference at a beamsplitter, specifically the integral P(τ, δτ, Δ). The integral involves the functions ζ1(t) and ζ2(t), which are defined using exponential terms dependent on τ, δτ, ω, and Δ. The expected result of the integral is given as P(τ, δτ, Δ) = (1/2)exp(-2|δτ - τ|) + (1/2)exp(-2|δτ + τ|) - (1/2)cos(|τ|Δ)exp(-2|δτ| + |τ|). The user expresses difficulty in understanding how to handle the absolute value terms in the integration process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum optics and two-photon interference
  • Familiarity with complex functions and their conjugates
  • Knowledge of integrals over infinite domains
  • Proficiency in mathematical expressions involving exponential and absolute value functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of complex conjugates in quantum mechanics
  • Learn techniques for integrating functions with absolute values
  • Explore the mathematical foundations of two-photon interference
  • Investigate the role of beamsplitters in quantum optics experiments
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in quantum optics, physicists working on photon interference experiments, and students studying advanced quantum mechanics concepts will benefit from this discussion.

Baggio
Messages
211
Reaction score
1
Hello,

I am trying to derive a function which describes the probability of two-photons interfering at a beamsplitter however I'm stuck on this particular integral. I need to solve:

P(\tau,\delta\tau,\Delta)=\frac{1}{4}\int|\zeta_{1}(t+\tau)\zeta_{2}(t)-\zeta_{1}(t)\zeta_{2}(t+\tau)|^2dt

The integral is over all t, i.e. t = -infinity to t = infinity

Where |...|^2 means the terms inside are multiplied by it's complex conjugate, and

<br /> \[<br /> \begin{array}{l}<br /> \zeta _1 (t) = \sqrt[4]{{\frac{2}{\pi }}}\exp ( - (t - \delta \tau /2) - i(\omega - \Delta /2)){\rm{ }}\forall {\rm{ }}t - \delta \tau /2 &gt; 0 \\ <br /> \zeta _1 (t) = 0{\rm{ }}\forall {\rm{ }}t - \delta \tau /2 &lt; 0 \\ <br /> \zeta _2 (t) = \sqrt[4]{{\frac{2}{\pi }}}\exp ( - (t + \delta \tau /2) - i(\omega + \Delta /2)){\rm{ }}\forall {\rm{ }}t + \delta \tau /2 &gt; 0 \\ <br /> \zeta _2 (t) = 0{\rm{ }}\forall {\rm{ }}t + \delta \tau /2 &lt; 0 \\ <br /> \end{array}<br /> \]<br />

Here \tau, \delta\tau, \omega, \Delta and t are real

The function that I expect to derive is:

<br /> \[<br /> P(\tau ,\delta \tau ,\Delta ) = \frac{1}{2}\exp \left( { - 2\left| {\delta \tau - \tau } \right|} \right) + \frac{1}{2}\exp \left( { - 2\left| {\delta \tau + \tau } \right|} \right) - \cos \left( {\left| \tau \right|\Delta } \right)\frac{1}{2}\exp \left( { - 2\left| {\delta \tau } \right| + \left| \tau \right|} \right)<br /> \]<br />

|...| denotes absolute value.

In the integral above would I have to split it up into several contributions depending on which condition on "t" is satisfied. Also I don't see how integrating this function could lead to the absolute value terms in function P.

If anyone could offer any help at all I'd be very greatful... My research is stagnent because of this!

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
anyone? :/
 
I'd have to consult my physics professor D=
 
hehe, i don't think it should be that difficult btw in the eqs above it should be

<br /> <br /> \[<br /> \begin{array}{l}<br /> \zeta _1 (t) = \sqrt[4]{{\frac{2}{\pi }}}\exp ( - (t - \delta \tau /2) - i(\omega - \Delta /2)t){\rm{ }}\forall {\rm{ }}t - \delta \tau /2 &gt; 0 \\ <br /> \zeta _1 (t) = 0{\rm{ }}\forall {\rm{ }}t - \delta \tau /2 &lt; 0 \\ <br /> \zeta _2 (t) = \sqrt[4]{{\frac{2}{\pi }}}\exp ( - (t + \delta \tau /2) - i(\omega + \Delta /2)t){\rm{ }}\forall {\rm{ }}t + \delta \tau /2 &gt; 0 \\ <br /> \zeta _2 (t) = 0{\rm{ }}\forall {\rm{ }}t + \delta \tau /2 &lt; 0 \\ <br /> \end{array}<br /> \]<br /> <br />

it's just math :/
 
bump..
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K