Help Solving Automobile and Train Problems

  • Thread starter Thread starter fphysicsclass
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Automobile Train
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving two physics problems involving relative motion between an automobile and a train, as well as a police car chasing a speeder. For the first problem, the automobile traveling at 90 km/h overtakes a 1 km long train moving at 80 km/h, taking 6 minutes and covering 9 km. When traveling in opposite directions, the time taken is 21.2 seconds, with a distance of 0.53 km. The second problem involves a police car accelerating at 2.5 m/s² after being passed by a speeder at 140 km/h, with the solution yielding a time of approximately 4.36 seconds for the police car to catch up.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of relative velocity concepts
  • Familiarity with kinematic equations, specifically dx=v(0)t+(1/2)at²
  • Ability to convert units between km/h and m/s
  • Graphical representation of motion (x-t and v-t graphs)
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to apply relative velocity in multi-object motion problems
  • Study kinematic equations in-depth, focusing on acceleration and displacement
  • Practice unit conversions, especially between different speed units
  • Explore graphical analysis of motion, including position vs. time and velocity vs. time graphs
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those tackling problems in kinematics and relative motion, as well as educators seeking to enhance their teaching methods in these topics.

fphysicsclass
Messages
37
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I've already done 10 probs, but I can't figure these out. Please help if you can.

1. An automobile traveling v = 90 km/h overtakes a L = 1.00 km long train traveling in the same direction on a track parallel to the road. If the train's speed is 80 km/h, how long does it take the car to pass it, and how far will the car have traveled in this time?
x min
x km
What are the results if the car and train are traveling in opposite directions?
x s
x km

2. An unmarked police car traveling a constant 125 km/h is passed by a speeder traveling 140 km/h. Precisely 1.00 s after the speeder passes, the policeman steps on the accelerator. If the police car's acceleration is 2.50 m/s2, how much time passes after the speeder passes before the police car overtakes the speeder (assumed moving at constant speed)?

x s

Homework Equations



dx=v(0)t+(1/2)at^2
v^2=v(0)^2+2adx

The Attempt at a Solution



1. dx=10t? Tried making it into a rel. vel. problem.

2. (38.9)^2=(34.7)^2+2(2.5)dx ?? I've been working on this one for an hour...
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Can anyone help?
 


For the first one, I would try thinking about the difference in speed between the two moving objects. Ask yourself how fast the car is moving relative to the train. Then, given that information, how long does it take to travel that 1 km length of the train. You will then have a time to use to figure out the distance traveled on the road.
 


1. Both are moving. The train is leading by 1.0km at time t=0. You have to find the time for both the train front fender and car front fender at same position/displacement.
2. The same procedure except one body is accelerating and the other at constant velocity.

Sketch graph of position vs time for question 1 and velocity vs time for question 2 is very helpful.
ISEC (Isaac Newton)- indentify, sketch, execute and finally check
 
Last edited:


I did draw the graphs before, and they are accurate. I'm just bad at using equations. I'll let you know in less than 5 mins. what I tried and got on the first one.
 


Also, it wouldn't make sense for the first one to draw a v-t graph because v doesn't tell you anything about position. Should I instead drawn a x-t graph?
 


ehh. I can't even figure out the first one. So, I have 90t + 1 = ?

I don't know where to go from there. Oh wait. 90t+1 = delta x?
 


I don't know. Can anyone help? this is frustrating, and I almost have to turn it in online. I tried graphing the x-t graph, and can't make sense of it. I understand that one must equate 2 equations - that is how you find the intersection. But my answer is always wrong. I just want some help. Thanks.
 


Ok, ask yourself this:

If you were standing on the train, how fast would you perceive the car to be moving?

If you take the perceived speed and use it to figure out how long it takes for the car to travel 1km (the length of the train), what number do you get? It's just as simple as t=d/v.

So then you would have the amount of time that it takes the car to pass the train and can use that and the specified speed to figure out the actual distance the car traveled.
 
  • #10


1. x-t diagram. At t=0, train at position 1km, and car at position 0.
Then the position increases depends on the speed. Both at constant speed, thus a straight lines. One start from x=1km and the other from origin. Where the lines intersect is the place they meet(both front ends).

2. Drawing a parabolic curve is a bit hard especially with my poor free-hand drawing. But if you draw a v-t, a constant velocity is a straight line parallel to x-axis and constant acceleration a slanting one with the gradient equal to the acceleration. The distance move is just v times t. From a constant velocity is just a rectangular area and for constant acceleration it is a triangular area.
 
Last edited:
  • #11


For 1, I did 10t = 1; t = 6 min. Does anyone (dis)agree, and can help with 1 and/or 2?
 
  • #12


azizlwl - I will try your method, and I think I messed up in drawing the x-t graph for a = c. I drew the v as exponentially increasing. I got it confused with the x-t graph. You know how it is, first day of AP Phys. A little lost. Haven't taken phys in 2 years. Will keep you updated.
 
  • #13


Ok. So for 1, I got 6 min and 9 km. Now I need to do part b.

Also, I will be starting 2 after that.
 
  • #14


Those are the answers I got for 1a. Just use a similar approach for 1b.
 
  • #15


On #1, how should I start out on the opposite directions. I know that the train will be traveling @ -80 kmh, and the car, +90 kmh. I don't know what the relative velocity of the train would be. Maybe -170 kmh?
 
  • #16


I probably should find the rel. vel. of the car. If I did, would I be right to use 170t = 1 to solve for time? I got 0.02 s.
 
  • #17


fphysicsclass said:
I probably should find the rel. vel. of the car. If I did, would I be right to use 170t = 1 to solve for time? I got 0.02 s.

Yes.

Well, yes to the equation, but not sure where the 0.02s is coming from.
 
  • #18


170 is in kmh. I converted my answer to seconds because that is what the answer form asked for. I made sure to include it in my original post.
 
  • #19


Which actually should be moved over a couple decimal places and be 21.2 seconds.
 
  • #20


May want to double-check that conversion. 0.02 s is an awfully quick kilometer :P
 
  • #21


Haha, yes it is. That is why I did double check.

I submitted my answer for that one, and got it right. It was 21.2 seconds, and 0.53 km.

Now for #2!
 
  • #22


Thank God you can type in "1/170 hours to seconds" and get a perfect conversion.
 
  • #23


I'm lost again. I was trying to find distance when I should have been trying to find time. Any tips for starting number 2? I already drew a v-t graph, making sure my constant a was a straight line.
 
  • #24


I started number 2 using knowledge from 1. I set 2 displacement equations equal to each other. Was I wrong to say that: (1/2)(2.5)(t^2)=4.2t ?? I will add a second at the end to make up for the lost time.
 
  • #25


And I ended up on 2 getting 4.36 seconds. Did anyone else get this?
 
  • #26


From the graphs,

1a. Taking frontend as a point for intersection
1+80t=90t
1b. Taking backend of the train as origin and the point for intersection,
80t=-90t+1

2. 140/3600(t+1)=123/3600(t+1) + 0.5at2
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K