MHB Help Understanding Bland's Proposition 4.3.14 in Rings and Their Modules

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Paul E. Bland's book, "Rings and Their Modules".

I am focused on Section 4.3: Modules Over Principal Ideal Domains ... and I need some further help in order to fully understand the proof of Proposition 4.3.14 ... ...

Proposition 4.3.14 reads as follows:View attachment 8320
View attachment 8321In the above proof by Bland we read the following:

" ... ... If $$\{ x_1 \}$$ is a basis for $$F$$, then there is an $$a \in R$$ such that $$x = x_1 a$$. But $$x$$ is primitive, so $$a$$ is a unit in $$R$$. Hence $$x R = x_1 R$$ ... ... "

My question is as follows:

Why in the above quote, does it follow that $$x R = x_1 R$$ ... ... ?Is it because $$x = x_1 a$$ where $$a$$ is a unit ... ... ... ... ... (1)

Hence $$xR = x_1 a R$$ ... ... I presume this follows (1)

Therefore $$xR = x_1 (a R )$$

But $$aR = R$$ since a is a unit ... ''

So $$xR = x_1 R $$

Is that correct?

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you did it correct.

You can do it also this way:

Let $y \in xR$ then $y=xr=x_1ar \in x_1R$
and
Let $y \in x_1R$ then $y=x_1s=xa^{-1}s \in xR$
 
steenis said:
Yes, you did it correct.

You can do it also this way:

Let $y \in xR$ then $y=xr=x_1ar \in x_1R$
and
Let $y \in x_1R$ then $y=x_1s=xa^{-1}s \in xR$

Thanks for the help, Steenis ...

Peter
 
The world of 2\times 2 complex matrices is very colorful. They form a Banach-algebra, they act on spinors, they contain the quaternions, SU(2), su(2), SL(2,\mathbb C), sl(2,\mathbb C). Furthermore, with the determinant as Euclidean or pseudo-Euclidean norm, isu(2) is a 3-dimensional Euclidean space, \mathbb RI\oplus isu(2) is a Minkowski space with signature (1,3), i\mathbb RI\oplus su(2) is a Minkowski space with signature (3,1), SU(2) is the double cover of SO(3), sl(2,\mathbb C) is the...