Help Understanding Bland's Proposition 4.3.14 in Rings and Their Modules

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Proposition 4.3.14 from Paul E. Bland's "Rings and Their Modules," specifically regarding the proof that if \( x \) is a primitive element in a principal ideal domain and can be expressed as \( x = x_1 a \) where \( a \) is a unit, then it follows that \( xR = x_1R \). Participants confirm that since \( a \) is a unit, \( aR = R \), leading to the conclusion that \( xR = x_1R \). The proof is validated through two approaches, demonstrating the equivalence of the ideals generated by \( x \) and \( x_1 \).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of principal ideal domains (PIDs)
  • Familiarity with the concept of units in ring theory
  • Knowledge of module theory, particularly in relation to ideals
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical proofs and notation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of units in rings and their implications on ideal generation
  • Explore the structure of modules over principal ideal domains
  • Review the proof techniques used in ring theory, focusing on ideal containment
  • Investigate other propositions in Bland's "Rings and Their Modules" for deeper understanding
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, graduate students in algebra, and anyone studying ring theory and module theory will benefit from this discussion, particularly those focusing on the properties of ideals in principal ideal domains.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Paul E. Bland's book, "Rings and Their Modules".

I am focused on Section 4.3: Modules Over Principal Ideal Domains ... and I need some further help in order to fully understand the proof of Proposition 4.3.14 ... ...

Proposition 4.3.14 reads as follows:View attachment 8320
View attachment 8321In the above proof by Bland we read the following:

" ... ... If $$\{ x_1 \}$$ is a basis for $$F$$, then there is an $$a \in R$$ such that $$x = x_1 a$$. But $$x$$ is primitive, so $$a$$ is a unit in $$R$$. Hence $$x R = x_1 R$$ ... ... "

My question is as follows:

Why in the above quote, does it follow that $$x R = x_1 R$$ ... ... ?Is it because $$x = x_1 a$$ where $$a$$ is a unit ... ... ... ... ... (1)

Hence $$xR = x_1 a R$$ ... ... I presume this follows (1)

Therefore $$xR = x_1 (a R )$$

But $$aR = R$$ since a is a unit ... ''

So $$xR = x_1 R $$

Is that correct?

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you did it correct.

You can do it also this way:

Let $y \in xR$ then $y=xr=x_1ar \in x_1R$
and
Let $y \in x_1R$ then $y=x_1s=xa^{-1}s \in xR$
 
steenis said:
Yes, you did it correct.

You can do it also this way:

Let $y \in xR$ then $y=xr=x_1ar \in x_1R$
and
Let $y \in x_1R$ then $y=x_1s=xa^{-1}s \in xR$

Thanks for the help, Steenis ...

Peter
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K