Help understanding chemistry (an idea for harnessing energy)

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter andrewbb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chemistry Energy Idea
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mechanisms of water evaporation and boiling, specifically focusing on the behavior of water molecules as they transition from liquid to vapor. Participants explore various theories related to molecular interactions, energy dynamics, and the role of environmental factors in these processes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant theorizes that heat or airflow separates H2O molecules, leading to an attraction between water molecules and air molecules based on electrical charges.
  • Another participant discusses capillary action and its relationship to temperature and molecular vibration, suggesting that higher temperatures increase the rate of evaporation by affecting hydrogen bonds.
  • Concerns are raised about how individual water molecules detach from cohesive bonds and the role of thermal energy in this process.
  • Some participants mention the average atomic mass of air and water, arguing that water vapor is lighter than air, which contributes to its rising behavior.
  • There is a discussion about vapor pressure and equilibrium, with one participant noting that water molecules are in constant motion, escaping and being recaptured.
  • One participant emphasizes the importance of understanding the upward flow of water vapor in relation to temperature and density changes, referencing the ideal gas law.
  • Another participant proposes that the surface area of water affects evaporation rates and discusses the impact of environmental conditions on this process.
  • Some participants question the role of polar molecules in the air and whether dipole forces contribute to evaporation.
  • There is a suggestion that reducing the energy holding water down could enhance evaporation efficiency in a proposed device.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the mechanisms of evaporation and the factors influencing it. There is no consensus on the specific processes at the molecular level, and multiple competing explanations are presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight various assumptions, such as the role of thermal energy, the influence of surface area, and the nature of molecular interactions in air. The discussion includes references to specific scientific principles and equations, but these are not universally accepted or agreed upon.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying chemistry, physics, or engineering, particularly in relation to thermodynamics, fluid dynamics, and molecular interactions.

  • #31
Two theories on water evaporation:
1. water molecule turns in such a way that two oxygens create a magnetic repulsion and the water molecule is pushed into the air.
2. water molecule turns in such a way that its magnetic attraction to something in the air (eg. nitrogen) is greater than the hydrogen bond that causes water's cohesion. That pulls it into the air and it floats upward.

In the case of boiling, I think water vapor is stand-alone and does not adhere to other molecules/atoms immediately. However, in the case of evaporation, I think water molecules adhere to molecules/atoms in the air such as nitrogen. Saturation of the surrounding air means all the nitrogen has a water molecule adhered to it. Probably a bit of both is going on.

My point in saying this is that evaporation does not require heat or sunlight to be added. It occurs at the molecular electromagnetic attraction/repulsion level.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
andrewbb said:
I don't know where he got that equation from, but you can see easily enough from heating water on your stove or setting a glass of water on your driveway that it doesn't even boil that fast, much less evaporate that fast. That only takes a very small amount of critical thinking skill to recognize.

Further down on "the van"s page, someone asks the source of the equation and "the van" doesn't look it up. I think "the van" remembered the equation incorrectly and should have realized the answer was nonsense.
Water does evaporate without heat added.

Googling comes up with this equation and example for water evaporation from a pool: http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/evaporation-water-surface-d_690.html
No it doesn't. The heat required to boil a cup of water and to lelt it evaporate naturally is exactly the same.
My thinking is that in a closed system, saturation of the surrounding air is the goal.
If the air is saturated, water can no longer evaporate: that's what "saturation" means: the air his holding as much water as it can.
Two theories on water evaporation:
You don't need to idly speculate your way into this, you need to open a chemistry or thermodynamics book and learn the reality of how these things work. And we won't humor idle speculation here.

You need to take a step back/deep breath and start thinking critically and learning properly. Idle speculation based on complete ignorance of a subject (any subject) is not a path to learning/discovery.
 
Last edited:
  • #33
Boiling is DIFFERENT than evaporation. Boiling does take energy and vaporizes water quickly.

However, evaporation exists. Same temperature. I'm not sure why you're getting emotional about a physical process, but evaporation happens.

So, how does it occur? Well... cohesiveness of water would be the thing to look at. That's determined by the hydrogen bond of hydrogen atoms on that water molecule. How does a water molecule separate from that bond? Well... somehow it is being either repelled or attracted to something else. I've described the process above.

In a system of water & air that is of the same temperature, does evaporation exist?
Answer is of course yes.

Therefore, something is happening at the molecular level that does not require "excitetation" or heat added to the system.

I've described that process above. Sorry, but your textbooks were incomplete.
 
  • #34
What I've described above is the NEW science that replaces chemistry and is called Molecular Dynamics.
 
  • #35
Chemistry is dead?

This is sweet, now I don't have to worry about passing that AP Chemistry exam!
 
  • #36
andrewbb said:
Boiling is DIFFERENT than evaporation. Boiling does take energy and vaporizes water quickly.

However, evaporation exists. Same temperature. I'm not sure why you're getting emotional about a physical process, but evaporation happens. So, how does it occur? Well... cohesiveness of water would be the thing to look at. That's determined by the hydrogen bond of hydrogen atoms on that water molecule. How does a water molecule separate from that bond? Well... somehow it is being either repelled or attracted to something else. I've described the process above.

In a system of water & air that is of the same temperature, does evaporation exist?
Answer is of course yes.

Therefore, something is happening at the molecular level that does not require "excitetation" or heat added to the system.
Your understanding of how evaporation works is incorrect...your understanding of why is even worse.

FYI, I make my living designing heating and air conditioning systems, including evaporative cooling systems such as cooling towers. Cooling towers cool water down below ambient temperature by evaporating some of the water to carry off heat. (Your sweaty skin does the same thing on a hot day, by the way). So as a last-ditch effort (that I won't back-check to see if it worked...), please read the wiki on wet bulb temperature, which is a way to measure heat loss due to evaporation: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wet-bulb_temperature
I've described that process above. Sorry, but your textbooks were incomplete.

What I've described above is the NEW science that replaces chemistry and is called Molecular Dynamics.
Sorry, but as I already said, this is a site for discussing real science only. What you are saying is crackpottery and it is not worth our effort to try to turn you back toward reality. You must choose to do that on your own. If you make that choice, then we can help you make the trip.

OP answered, thread no longer productive, thread locked.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K