Help Understanding Limit Property Proof on Spivak's Calculus

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding a proof related to limit properties as presented in Spivak's Calculus, specifically on page 89. Participants are examining the conditions under which the inequality |xy - x_0y_0| < ε holds, analyzing the steps of the proof, and clarifying assumptions made in the reasoning.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the assumption that min(1, ε/(2(|y_0| + 1))) is equal to 1, suggesting that a proof by cases might be necessary.
  • Another participant clarifies that the minimum value depends on ε and that both conditions |x - a| < min(y,z) imply |x - a| < y and |x - a| < z are satisfied.
  • A different participant expresses confusion about the transition from line 3 to line 4 in the proof, indicating that only part of the reasoning seems valid under certain conditions.
  • One participant challenges the equality presented in line 4, arguing that it should be a less than sign due to the nature of the terms involved.
  • Another participant proposes an alternative approach to extend the inequality in line 3, suggesting that the terms should be adjusted to reflect the conditions more accurately.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit disagreement regarding the assumptions made in the proof, particularly concerning the minimum function and the transition between steps. There is no consensus on the correctness of the proof as presented, and multiple interpretations of the inequalities remain.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the proof relies on specific conditions for ε and the values of x and y, which may not be universally applicable without further clarification. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the implications of the min function and the assumptions underlying the inequalities.

alyks
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi, I've been studying from Spivak's Calculus. Normally when I have trouble I can just search, but this time I can't find anything (you can tell how extensive this forum is in that I've been registered here for a while and this is my first post). On page 89, the book gives proof of the following:

If
[tex]|x - x_0| < \text{min} \left (1, \frac{\epsilon}{2(|y_0| + 1)}\right)[/tex] and [tex]|y - y_0| < \frac{\epsilon}{2(|x_0| + 1)}[/tex]

Then

[tex]|xy - x_0y_0| < \epsilon[/tex]

The proof shows this:

1. Since [tex]|x-x_0| < 1[/tex] we have [tex]|x| - |x_0| \leq |x-x_0| < 1[/tex] so that [tex]|x| < 1 + |x_0|[/tex]

Thus,

2. [tex]|xy - x_0y_0| = |x(y-y_0) + y_0(x-x_0)|[/tex]
3. [tex]\leq |x| \cdot |y - y_0| + |y_0| \cdot (|x - x_0|)[/tex]
4. [tex]\leq (1 + |x_0|) \cdot \frac{\epsilon}{2(|x_0| + 1)} + |y_0| \cdot \frac{\epsilon}{2(|y_0| + 1)} = \frac{\epsilon}{2} + \frac{\epsilon}{2}[/tex]

Where I have a problem is in how he just assumes that [tex]\text{min} \left (1, \frac{\epsilon}{2(|y_0| + 1)}\right)[/tex] is 1, when I saw the minimum I would have thought you'd do a proof by cases.

Then later, I have a hard time understanding how he went from line 3 to line 4. If [tex]|x| < 1 + |x_0|[/tex] and [tex]|y - y_0| < \frac{\epsilon}{2(|x_0| + 1)}[/tex], then only half of line four makes sense. Otherwise, I'm lost. Will anybody help me out?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
He doesn't assume that [itex]\text{min} \left (1, \frac{\epsilon}{2(|y_0| + 1)}\right)[/itex] is 1. If epsilon is small enough, then clearly the minimum will not be 1. In any case, you'll save yourself a lot of confusion if you think of |x - a| < min(y,z) as simply stating that both |x-a| < y AND |x-a| < z are satisfied. In fact, look back at exercises 22-24 (or somewhere around there) of chapter 1; he states this reasoning explicitly. I'm not sure what's confusing about going from line 3 to 4... If you are wondering why there is an equals sign in line 4, I'm pretty sure that is a minor oversight. It should be a less than sign since |y_0| < |y_0| + 1.
 
Oh wow, it does save a lot of confusion with the min, I was thinking about it wrong.
 
alyks said:
Hi, I've been studying from Spivak's Calculus. Normally when I have trouble I can just search, but this time I can't find anything (you can tell how extensive this forum is in that I've been registered here for a while and this is my first post). On page 89, the book gives proof of the following:

If
[tex]|x - x_0| < \text{min} \left (1, \frac{\epsilon}{2(|y_0| + 1)}\right)[/tex] and [tex]|y - y_0| < \frac{\epsilon}{2(|x_0| + 1)}[/tex]

Then

[tex]|xy - x_0y_0| < \epsilon[/tex]

The proof shows this:

1. Since [tex]|x-x_0| < 1[/tex] we have [tex]|x| - |x_0| \leq |x-x_0| < 1[/tex] so that [tex]|x| < 1 + |x_0|[/tex]

Thus,

2. [tex]|xy - x_0y_0| = |x(y-y_0) + y_0(x-x_0)|[/tex]
3. [tex]\leq |x| \cdot |y - y_0| + |y_0| \cdot (|x - x_0|)[/tex]
4. [tex]\leq (1 + |x_0|) \cdot \frac{\epsilon}{2(|x_0| + 1)} + |y_0| \cdot \frac{\epsilon}{2(|y_0| + 1)} = \frac{\epsilon}{2} + \frac{\epsilon}{2}[/tex]

Where I have a problem is in how he just assumes that [tex]\text{min} \left (1, \frac{\epsilon}{2(|y_0| + 1)}\right)[/tex] is 1, when I saw the minimum I would have thought you'd do a proof by cases.

Then later, I have a hard time understanding how he went from line 3 to line 4. If [tex]|x| < 1 + |x_0|[/tex] and [tex]|y - y_0| < \frac{\epsilon}{2(|x_0| + 1)}[/tex], then only half of line four makes sense. Otherwise, I'm lost. Will anybody help me out?

1st of all No 4 is wrong,because :

[tex](1 + |x_0|) \cdot \frac{\epsilon}{2(|x_0| + 1)} + |y_0| \cdot \frac{\epsilon}{2(|y_0| + 1)}[/tex]

IT is not equal to ε/2 + ε/2,

but :

[tex](1 + |x_0|) \cdot \frac{\epsilon}{2(|x_0| + 1)} + (|y_0|+1) \cdot \frac{\epsilon}{2(|y_0| + 1)}[/tex] it is equal to ε/2 +ε/2

So you have to extend No 3 inequality and :

3. [tex]\leq |x| \cdot |y - y_0| + |y_0| \cdot (|x - x_0|)[/tex] [tex]\leq |x| \cdot |y - y_0| + (|y_0|+1) \cdot (|x - x_0|)[/tex].

Then :

[tex]|x - x_0| < \text{min} \left (1, \frac{\epsilon}{2(|y_0| + 1)}\right)[/tex] and [tex]|y - y_0| < \frac{\epsilon}{2(|x_0| + 1)}[/tex]

Implies that:

1) [tex]|x-x_{o}|\leq 1[/tex] which implies that: [tex]|x|\leq |x_{o}| +1[/tex]

AND

2) [tex]|x-x_{o}|\leq\frac{\epsilon}{2(|y_{o}|+1)}[/tex]
AND

3) [tex]|y-y_{o}|<\frac{\epsilon}{2(|x_{o}|+1)}[/tex]

AND using (1) (2) and (3) we have :


[tex]|xy-x_{o}y_{o}|\leq |x| \cdot |y - y_0| + (|y_0|+1) \cdot (|x - x_0|)<(1 + |x_0|) \cdot \frac{\epsilon}{2(|x_0| + 1)} + (|y_0|+1) \cdot \frac{\epsilon}{2(|y_0| + 1)}= \frac{\epsilon}{2}+\frac{\epsilon}{2} = \epsilon[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K