Help Understanding Limit Property Proof on Spivak's Calculus

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 4K views
alyks
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi, I've been studying from Spivak's Calculus. Normally when I have trouble I can just search, but this time I can't find anything (you can tell how extensive this forum is in that I've been registered here for a while and this is my first post). On page 89, the book gives proof of the following:

If
[tex]|x - x_0| < \text{min} \left (1, \frac{\epsilon}{2(|y_0| + 1)}\right)[/tex] and [tex]|y - y_0| < \frac{\epsilon}{2(|x_0| + 1)}[/tex]

Then

[tex]|xy - x_0y_0| < \epsilon[/tex]

The proof shows this:

1. Since [tex]|x-x_0| < 1[/tex] we have [tex]|x| - |x_0| \leq |x-x_0| < 1[/tex] so that [tex]|x| < 1 + |x_0|[/tex]

Thus,

2. [tex]|xy - x_0y_0| = |x(y-y_0) + y_0(x-x_0)|[/tex]
3. [tex]\leq |x| \cdot |y - y_0| + |y_0| \cdot (|x - x_0|)[/tex]
4. [tex]\leq (1 + |x_0|) \cdot \frac{\epsilon}{2(|x_0| + 1)} + |y_0| \cdot \frac{\epsilon}{2(|y_0| + 1)} = \frac{\epsilon}{2} + \frac{\epsilon}{2}[/tex]

Where I have a problem is in how he just assumes that [tex]\text{min} \left (1, \frac{\epsilon}{2(|y_0| + 1)}\right)[/tex] is 1, when I saw the minimum I would have thought you'd do a proof by cases.

Then later, I have a hard time understanding how he went from line 3 to line 4. If [tex]|x| < 1 + |x_0|[/tex] and [tex]|y - y_0| < \frac{\epsilon}{2(|x_0| + 1)}[/tex], then only half of line four makes sense. Otherwise, I'm lost. Will anybody help me out?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
He doesn't assume that [itex]\text{min} \left (1, \frac{\epsilon}{2(|y_0| + 1)}\right)[/itex] is 1. If epsilon is small enough, then clearly the minimum will not be 1. In any case, you'll save yourself a lot of confusion if you think of |x - a| < min(y,z) as simply stating that both |x-a| < y AND |x-a| < z are satisfied. In fact, look back at exercises 22-24 (or somewhere around there) of chapter 1; he states this reasoning explicitly. I'm not sure what's confusing about going from line 3 to 4... If you are wondering why there is an equals sign in line 4, I'm pretty sure that is a minor oversight. It should be a less than sign since |y_0| < |y_0| + 1.
 
Oh wow, it does save a lot of confusion with the min, I was thinking about it wrong.
 
alyks said:
Hi, I've been studying from Spivak's Calculus. Normally when I have trouble I can just search, but this time I can't find anything (you can tell how extensive this forum is in that I've been registered here for a while and this is my first post). On page 89, the book gives proof of the following:

If
[tex]|x - x_0| < \text{min} \left (1, \frac{\epsilon}{2(|y_0| + 1)}\right)[/tex] and [tex]|y - y_0| < \frac{\epsilon}{2(|x_0| + 1)}[/tex]

Then

[tex]|xy - x_0y_0| < \epsilon[/tex]

The proof shows this:

1. Since [tex]|x-x_0| < 1[/tex] we have [tex]|x| - |x_0| \leq |x-x_0| < 1[/tex] so that [tex]|x| < 1 + |x_0|[/tex]

Thus,

2. [tex]|xy - x_0y_0| = |x(y-y_0) + y_0(x-x_0)|[/tex]
3. [tex]\leq |x| \cdot |y - y_0| + |y_0| \cdot (|x - x_0|)[/tex]
4. [tex]\leq (1 + |x_0|) \cdot \frac{\epsilon}{2(|x_0| + 1)} + |y_0| \cdot \frac{\epsilon}{2(|y_0| + 1)} = \frac{\epsilon}{2} + \frac{\epsilon}{2}[/tex]

Where I have a problem is in how he just assumes that [tex]\text{min} \left (1, \frac{\epsilon}{2(|y_0| + 1)}\right)[/tex] is 1, when I saw the minimum I would have thought you'd do a proof by cases.

Then later, I have a hard time understanding how he went from line 3 to line 4. If [tex]|x| < 1 + |x_0|[/tex] and [tex]|y - y_0| < \frac{\epsilon}{2(|x_0| + 1)}[/tex], then only half of line four makes sense. Otherwise, I'm lost. Will anybody help me out?

1st of all No 4 is wrong,because :

[tex](1 + |x_0|) \cdot \frac{\epsilon}{2(|x_0| + 1)} + |y_0| \cdot \frac{\epsilon}{2(|y_0| + 1)}[/tex]

IT is not equal to ε/2 + ε/2,

but :

[tex](1 + |x_0|) \cdot \frac{\epsilon}{2(|x_0| + 1)} + (|y_0|+1) \cdot \frac{\epsilon}{2(|y_0| + 1)}[/tex] it is equal to ε/2 +ε/2

So you have to extend No 3 inequality and :

3. [tex]\leq |x| \cdot |y - y_0| + |y_0| \cdot (|x - x_0|)[/tex] [tex]\leq |x| \cdot |y - y_0| + (|y_0|+1) \cdot (|x - x_0|)[/tex].

Then :

[tex]|x - x_0| < \text{min} \left (1, \frac{\epsilon}{2(|y_0| + 1)}\right)[/tex] and [tex]|y - y_0| < \frac{\epsilon}{2(|x_0| + 1)}[/tex]

Implies that:

1) [tex]|x-x_{o}|\leq 1[/tex] which implies that: [tex]|x|\leq |x_{o}| +1[/tex]

AND

2) [tex]|x-x_{o}|\leq\frac{\epsilon}{2(|y_{o}|+1)}[/tex]
AND

3) [tex]|y-y_{o}|<\frac{\epsilon}{2(|x_{o}|+1)}[/tex]

AND using (1) (2) and (3) we have :


[tex]|xy-x_{o}y_{o}|\leq |x| \cdot |y - y_0| + (|y_0|+1) \cdot (|x - x_0|)<(1 + |x_0|) \cdot \frac{\epsilon}{2(|x_0| + 1)} + (|y_0|+1) \cdot \frac{\epsilon}{2(|y_0| + 1)}= \frac{\epsilon}{2}+\frac{\epsilon}{2} = \epsilon[/tex]