Help understanding the Del operator

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Dawei
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Del Operator
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the del operator, a fundamental concept in vector calculus, particularly in the context of the Navier-Stokes equations. The del operator, denoted as ∇, is used for partial differentiation in three dimensions and is essential for understanding vector fields. It is applied to scalar functions to yield gradients and to vector functions to compute divergence and curl. The conversation highlights the importance of grasping these concepts for engineering students, especially those dealing with fluid dynamics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus, specifically the del operator (∇).
  • Familiarity with partial differentiation and its application in three dimensions.
  • Knowledge of scalar and vector fields, including gradients, divergence, and curl.
  • Basic comprehension of the Navier-Stokes equations and their significance in fluid dynamics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical properties and applications of the del operator in vector calculus.
  • Learn about the derivation and implications of the Navier-Stokes equations in fluid mechanics.
  • Explore examples of gradient, divergence, and curl in practical engineering problems.
  • Investigate the physical interpretation of the material derivative and its role in fluid dynamics.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for engineering students, particularly those specializing in fluid dynamics, as well as educators and professionals seeking to deepen their understanding of vector calculus and its applications in physics and engineering.

Dawei
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
I'm an engineering major taking an advanced level physics class. I realize that I really have no clue when it comes to basic mathematics, and it is extremely frustrating. I always just learned *how* to solve equations, never what I was actually doing.

For example the del operator. What exactly does this mean?
762462cbd19e9bf6d392e1d5636193d7.png


And what is the logic for turning it into this?
b0b2b5bd171ad8bf9b83fb3bf723bdb6.png


I feel like I just really need a good lesson starting with the very basics. I have no "feel" for what half of the symbols that I'm using mean.

I need to really understand and use the Navier Stokes equations for my job, and it's just killing me. Every time I try to look up a word or symbol I don't know, the explanation of it ends up having like 3 or 4 more words or symbols in it that I don't know. I took calc 1-3 and diff eq, did well in the classes, so it's extremely frustrating now to feel like I never actually learned anything, just sort of how to find patterns and solve homework problems...

Can anyone recommend a good explanation of the Navier Stokes equations for me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In Cartesian coordinates ]\nabla is the differential operator
\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\vec{i}+ \frac{\partial}{\partial y}\vec{j}+ \frac{\partial}{\partial x}\vec{k}.

Written that way, not applied to anything, it is not a true "vector", just a symbol, but applied to various kinds of functions, it can be thought of as a vector.

For example, if f(x,y,z) is a scalar valued function we can think of \nabla f, also called "grad f" or "gradient of f", as a vector times a scalar- the scalar "multiplies" each part of the vector:
\nabla f= \frac{\partial f}{\partial x}\vec{i}+ \frac{\partial f}{\partial y}\vec{j}+ \frac{\partial f}\partial z}\vec{k}.

If \vec{F}(x,y,z)is a vector function, say, \vec{F}(x,y,z)= f(x,y,z)\vec{i}+ g(x,y,z)\vec{j}+ h(x,y,z)\vec{k} then we can think in terms of the "dot product" or "cross productZ".

Thinking of "dot product" we have \nabla\cdot\vec{F}(x,y,z), also called "div \vec{F}" or "the divergence of \vec{F}", equal to
\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}+ \frac{\partial g}{\partial y}+ \frac{\partial h}{\partial z}.

Thinking of the "cross product" we have \nabla\times\vec{F}(x,y,z), also called "curl \vec{F}" or " curl of \vec{F}, equal to
\left(\frac{\partial h}{\partial y}- \frac{\partial g}{\partial z}\right)\vec{i}- \left(\frac{\partial h}{\partial x}- \frac{\partial f}{\partial z}\right)\vec{j}+ \left(\frac{\partial g}{\partial x}- \frac{\partial f}{\partial y}\right)\vec{k}

Now, let's look at
\frac{\partial\rho}{\partial t}+ \nabla\cdot(\rho\vec{u})= 0

Take \vec{u}= f\vec{i}+ g\vec{j}+ h\vec{k} so that \rho\vec{u}= \rho f\vec{i}+ \rho\ g\vec{j}+ \rho h\vec{k} and
\nabla\cdot(\rho\vec{u})= \frac{\partial(\rho f)}{\partial x}+ \frac{\partial(\rho g)}{\partial y}+ \frac{\partial(\rho h)}{\partial z}

By the product rule, each of those is
\frac{\partial\rho}{\partial x}f+ \rho \frac{\partial f}{\partial x}
\frac{\partial\rho}{\partial y}g+ \rho \frac{\partial g}{\partial y}
\frac{\partial\rho}{\partial z}h+ \rho \frac{\partial h}{\partial z}

We can write their sum as
\frac{\partial\rho}{\partial x}f+ \frac{\partial\rho}{\partial y}g+ \frac{\partial\rho}{\partial z}h
+ \rho \frac{\partial f}{\partial x}+ \rho\frac{\partial g}{\partial y}+ \rho\frac{\partial h}{\partial z}

= \nabla\rho\cdot \vec{u}+ \rho\nabla\cdot\vec{u}

Now, you will also need to know what
\frac{D\rho}{Dt} means. It is NOT just the derivative accidently written with "D" rather than "d". It is the rate of change as we move with the flow. Instead of sticking a, say, thermometer into water and measuring the temperature and rate of change of temperature at that point, we attach it to a float and let float down the stream, measuring the termperature and rate of change of temperature of a little "piece" or water as it flows down the stream.

Specifially, if F(x,y,z, t) is a function of the three space variables and time,
\frac{DF}{DT}= \frac{\partial F}{\partial t}+ \nabla F\cdot\vec{v}
where "\vec{v}" is the velocity vector of the water.<br /> <br /> Well, you can see that <br /> \frac{\partial\rho}{\partial t}+ \nabla\cdot(\rho\vec{u})<br /> becomes<br /> \frac{\partial\rho}{\partial t}+ (\nabla\rho\cdot \vec{u}+ \rho(\nabla\cdot\vec{u}))<br /> =(\frac{\partial\rho}{\partial t}+ \nabla\rho\cdot \vec{u})+ \rho(\nabla\cdot\vec{u})<br /> = \frac{D\rho}{Dt}+ \rho(\nabla\cdot\vec{u})<br /> <br /> But how that "u" mysteriously became "v", I cannot say- unless it is a misprint.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
993
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
11K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K