Help wanted to understand the Scheil equation

  • Thread starter JDRF85
  • Start date
In summary, the Scheil equation is used to determine the segregation of impurities from a liquid to a solid during solidification. It includes variables such as Cs (concentration of impurities in the solid), C0 (initial impurity concentration in the liquid), Keff (effective segregation coefficient), and fs (mass fraction of the melt that is solidified). As the solid fraction approaches 1, the denominator of the equation approaches 0, resulting in an infinite value for Cs. This indicates that the Scheil equation breaks down in this scenario and may need to be modified or refined for accurate results. Factors such as diffusion, undercooling, and interstitial impurities can also affect the accuracy of the Scheil equation.
  • #1
JDRF85
8
0
Hi guys

The Scheil equation for the segregation of impurities from a liquid to the solid during solidification is

Cs = C0Keff(1 - fs)^(Keff - 1)

Cs is the concentration of impurities in the solid

C0 is the initial impurity concentration in the liquid

Keff is the effective segregation coefficient (< or = 1)

fs is the mass fraction of the melt that is solidified.

I have trouble understanding what is going to happen as the solid fraction goes to 1. If anyone knows what's going on in this equation please help me out - I hate not understanding this!

Any further detail needed please let me know.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Try work the coefficient to its extremes.

In the case where k=0, the solid is pure A. (whatever A is)

In the case where k=1, the solid is the exact same as the liquid (i.e. there is no segregation).

What k tells, in essence, is the solid solubility of the two phases. If k=0 you are going to get a brutal eutectic where one phase is pure A and the other pure B (and you'll get a classic lamellar microstructure). If k=1 what precipitates out of the melt is in perfect harmony with the melt itself, so you see NO segregation, and you get a continuous, equiaxed microstructure. Everything else is somewhere in between.

Did this help?
 
  • #3
Thanks for the reply, MagnetDave. But I think I have not been clear with my question, so apologies. What I am intererested in is the evolution of the system with constant Keff somewhere between the extremes; as time goes on and solidfication proceeds the solid fraction fs is going to (by definition) go to unity, right? So what does this mean for the mathematics and the interpretation?

The bracket (1 - fs) goes to zero as fs goes to 1, and the exponent of that bracket which is (Keff - 1) will always be less than one. So surely this leads to a situation where you have approach or obtain a zero in the denominator on the right-hand side of the Scheil equation

Cs = C0(1 - fs)^(Keff - 1)

which seems to imply that Cs tends to infinity as the solidification completes. Whereas I would (naively?) expect it to tend to C0 if there is no volume change and no impurities are added or removed during the solidification.

Obviously I have not interpreted it correctly (nature abhors infinities or whatever) so I'd like to know where it "breaks down" and/or where I have gone wrong.

Cheers guys!
 
  • #4
JDRF85,

What denominator?

-MD
 
  • #5
The exponent (Keff - 1) will always be between zero and -1 (not just less than 1 as I erroneously wrote in my last post). So in the way that 3^(-1/2) = 1/[3^(1/2)] and 3^(-1/7) = 1/[3^(1/7)], the Scheil equation can be expressed as either

Cs/C0 = (1 - fs)^(Keff - 1)

or

Cs/C0 = 1/[(1 - fs)^(1 - Keff)]

They are equivalent. As fs goes to unity, the RHS denominator goes to zero, bringing the LHS to infinity. I suppose this is not an accurate physical description (!) so I am interested in knowing when the validity of the Scheil equation breaks down and/or what has to be modified to keep it accurate.

Johnny
 
  • #6
fs never gets there. What happens in a real system is that you run into the maximum solubility of the impurity, the drop out as a eutectic.

Scheil assumes that there is no diffusion into the solid (which is not entirely true) and that there is instant diffusion in the liquid (definitely not true). Large amounts of undercooling will hurt you, interstitial impurities in a high-solidus mixtures can hurt you. There have been a lot of refinements since the Scheil equation, but these tend to be very minor for most systems. Basically - Scheil does a nice enough job most the time, and is much easier to use, and needs fewer fudge factors.
 
  • #7
Thanks! Really, really, thankyou so much, because I was just at a loss here... It makes sense now that you've said it, but I just couldn't figure this one out. Cheers MagnetDave!
 

What is the Scheil equation?

The Scheil equation is a mathematical model used to predict the solidification behavior of alloys and how their microstructure changes during solidification.

Why is the Scheil equation important?

The Scheil equation is important because it allows scientists and engineers to understand and predict the properties of alloys, such as their strength and corrosion resistance, based on their composition and solidification process.

How is the Scheil equation used in research?

The Scheil equation is used in research to study the solidification behavior of alloys and to optimize their properties for various applications. It is also used to design new alloys with desired properties.

What factors affect the accuracy of the Scheil equation?

The accuracy of the Scheil equation can be affected by factors such as the cooling rate, the composition of the alloy, and the presence of impurities. Other factors, such as nucleation and growth kinetics, can also influence the results.

Are there any limitations to the Scheil equation?

Yes, the Scheil equation has some limitations. It assumes a simple solidification process and does not account for factors such as thermal gradients, fluid flow, and dendritic growth. It is also limited to binary alloys and may not accurately predict the behavior of complex multi-component alloys.

Similar threads

Replies
131
Views
4K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
457
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Biology and Chemistry Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Materials and Chemical Engineering
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top