I Help with a derivation from a paper (diatomic molecular potential)

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the derivation of the expectation value of a variable, X(r), in the context of a diatomic molecular potential described by an anharmonic oscillator. The user seeks clarification on how to transition from equations 2, 4, and 5 to equation 6, specifically regarding the Taylor expansion of X(r). It is noted that X(r) can be any function of r that can be expressed as a Taylor series. The original source of the equations is a scientific paper linked in the discussion. Assistance is requested to clarify these derivations and the nature of X(r).
Malamala
Messages
347
Reaction score
28
Hello! I am confused about the derivation in the screenshot below. This is in the context of a diatomic molecular potential, but the question is quite general. Say that the potential describing the interaction between 2 masses, as a function of the radius between them is given by the anharmonic oscillator potential in eq 4., where ##r_e## is the equilibrium separation. What I need is to calculate the expectation value of a new variable, ##X(r)## in between 2 wavefunctions of such a potential, eq. 2 (please ignore eq. 3 and most of the comments in the paragraph after, as they are not related to my question). They Taylor expand ##X(r)## as in eq. 5 and then they claim that from there it follows that ##X_\nu## (eq. 2) is given by eq. 6. Can someone help me understand how to go from eq. 2, 4 and 5 to eq. 6? Thank you!
Screenshot 2023-06-06 at 1.35.40 PM.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you explain what is ##X(r)## and give a reference to the source from which you took the screenshot?
 
div_grad said:
Can you explain what is ##X(r)## and give a reference to the source from which you took the screenshot?
X(r) can be any function of r (well any function that can be written as a Taylor series around some value). The original paper is this: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0022285279900602
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...