Help with a simple conversation of energy problem?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a conservation of energy problem involving a pulley system with two masses, one resting on the ground and the other suspended above it. The original poster attempts to calculate the speed of the larger mass when it hits the ground, using energy conservation principles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the conversion of potential energy into kinetic energy for both masses and the pulley. There are questions about the correctness of the original poster's algebra and the formulation of energy equations. Some participants suggest considering the kinetic energy of both masses and the rotational energy of the pulley.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the energy transformations involved in the system. There is a focus on clarifying the relationships between the variables and the equations used. Some guidance has been offered regarding the treatment of velocity and energy terms, but no consensus has been reached on the correct approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential issues with the original poster's algebra and the assumptions made in the energy equations. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity of energy conservation in this context, particularly regarding the interactions between the masses and the pulley system.

the_quack
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
energy is conserved, no slipping or air resistance or anything.

There is a pulley, on one side is a mass resting on the ground, and on the other side is a larger mass above the ground. If the larger mass is released, what is it's speed when it hits.

okay, here is what I have:

PgM = Pgm + KM + KR + Km
Mgh = mgh + v[ srqt(.5M) + sqrt(.5I)/r + sqrt(.5m) ]

I=
.5mr^2 = .5(7.50kg)(.260m)^2 = 0.2535kg*m^2
h=3
m=18
M=26.5
so
PgM = 779.1 J
Pgm = 529.2 J

My answer is v(M)=49.84m/s, completely illogical, and the book answer is 3.22m/s. What did I do wrong? All the numbers look right, and it appears to make sense, but the answer is way off...

Thanks for any help!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The smaller mass also has kinetic energy just before the larger mass hits the ground.
 
No conversation about energy is ever simple.
 
So, you're changing the potential energy of the large mass into:

potential energy for the small mass
energy in the pulley
kinetic energy of the large mass

There's one more thing with energy... if the large mass is moving, and it's attached to the small mass via a string and pulley...
 
hmm, I added the kinetic energy of the small mass and that only changed it a little...

Do you see any problems with my algebra? Is the formula correct?
PgM = Pgm + KM + KR + Km
Mgh = mgh + v[ srqt(.5M) + sqrt(.5I)/r + sqrt(.5m) ]
 
Any last-minute tips?

I have to quit pretty soon...
 
I don't think so, you seem to think that you can just pull out that V and sqrt the other terms. Thats a problem. Also, the V in the energy for the pulley is radial velocity or w(omega) that is not the same velocity as the boxes.
 
I know, the V in the equations was squared, wasn't it?

And w = v/r
 
Something to think about. The potential energy of the large mass is going to:

1 - Give the smaller mass potential energy to raise to height (h).
2 - Give the system of masses (M+m) kinetic energy for a speed (v).
3 - Give the pulley rotational energy at angular speed (w = v/r)

You've written that (I assume) as:

PgM = Pgm + KM + Km + KR

If I you write this out without the square-root bits you get:

[tex]Mgh - mgh = \frac{1}{2} (M + m) v^2 + \frac{1}{2}I \omega ^2[/tex]

Regards,
Sam
 
  • #10
Now its over to you to re-arrange and solve for v.

Hope that helps :-)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K