Help with compressed air thrust

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of using compressed air to lift a device weighing approximately 200 pounds to a height of 300 to 400 feet. Participants explore the necessary pressure, cylinder dimensions, and alternative propulsion methods, focusing on theoretical calculations and practical limitations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that the pressure required to lift the weight depends on the cross-sectional area of the piston and that the height achievable is influenced by the cylinder length and air supply.
  • Another participant calculates that to lift 400 pounds, a nozzle would need to expel air at a high velocity, requiring a pressure of 160 atmospheres in a 6-inch diameter cylinder, which raises concerns about thermal issues and the feasibility of such compression.
  • After realizing the weight is actually 200 pounds, a participant discusses the potential of using liquid air, estimating that with a specific ejection rate, it could theoretically achieve the desired lift.
  • Concerns are raised about the limited propellant capacity of the proposed setup, with calculations suggesting that the tank would only provide enough thrust for about 5 seconds.
  • Some participants suggest exploring alternative propulsion methods, such as electric propellers or JetCat engines, arguing they may be simpler and more effective than compressed air.
  • One participant emphasizes that compressed air may not provide sufficient energy for the task, suggesting that a different propulsion system might be necessary.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility of using compressed air for the proposed lift, with some arguing it is impractical while others explore theoretical possibilities. No consensus is reached on the viability of the original design or the best approach moving forward.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the assumptions made about the efficiency of compressed air as a propulsion source, the specific dimensions of the cylinder, and the calculations regarding thrust and propellant capacity. The discussion also highlights the complexities of achieving the desired lift with the proposed setup.

  • #31
BrightRaven210 said:
Exactly what I had in mind, but I couldn't find a high enough torque motor that won't be too big. And thanks, but I just need the math is all. Also my line will be steel cord.
Try checking out the "Superheroes" episode of Mythbusters (or maybe the Star Wars one, I forget) if you can find it on U-Tube or the Discovery Channel site. Jamie managed to build a wrist-mounted winch for his grappler that pulled him up fairly smartly, and that dude has got to be well over 200 lbs.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 82 ·
3
Replies
82
Views
28K
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K