Help with Fibonacci Transformation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lahooty
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Transformation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the Fibonacci transformation using the function T(a; b) = (a+b; a) to derive Fibonacci numbers from initial values a = 1 and b = 0. The user attempts to prove that T^k(1; 0) results in the Fibonacci numbers F(k+1) and F(k) through mathematical induction. The discussion highlights the need for a clearer justification of the inductive step, specifically the transition from T^k(1; 0) to T^(k+1)(1; 0), which requires a more rigorous approach to factorization.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fibonacci sequence and its properties
  • Familiarity with mathematical induction techniques
  • Basic knowledge of function transformations
  • Ability to manipulate sequences and series
NEXT STEPS
  • Study mathematical induction proofs in detail
  • Explore function transformations and their applications
  • Research the properties of Fibonacci numbers and their derivations
  • Learn about recursive functions and their implementations
USEFUL FOR

Students in mathematics, particularly those studying algorithms and number theory, as well as educators looking for examples of proof techniques in mathematical discussions.

Lahooty
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A more efficient algorithm to calculate Fibonacci numbers applies the simultaneous transformation:

T(a; b) = (a+b; a)

repeatedly with a = 1 and b = 0 as initial values.

What Fibonacci numbers result from T^k(1; 0)? Justify your answer (e.g., as proof by induction in k would be nice).


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Let k = 1

T^1(1; 0) = (1; 1) = (F2; F1)

Assume T^k(1; 0) = (Fk+1; Fk) and show T^(k+1)(1; 0) = (Fk+2; Fk+1)

T^(k+1)(1; 0) = T^k(T^1(1; 0)) = T^k(1; 1) = (Fk+2; Fk+1)

Is this enough to conclude my solution and justify the proof? Any help will be greatly appreciated.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lahooty said:
T^k(1; 1) = (Fk+2; Fk+1)
I see no justification for that step. Your inductive hypothesis concerned T^k(1; 0), so you need to derive an expression involving exactly that. Try factorising T^(k+1) differently.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K