Help with Hohenberg-Kohn Theorem

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter TeethWhitener
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the first Hohenberg-Kohn theorem, specifically addressing the uniqueness of ground states for different Hamiltonians, ##H_1## and ##H_2##. The key conclusion is that if the Hamiltonians differ, their ground states must also differ, which is established through the relationship between the potentials and energy levels. The proof demonstrates that the potentials can only differ by a constant, reinforcing the uniqueness of solutions to the corresponding partial differential equations. The example provided illustrates how changes in the potential function do not affect the ground state when the wave function approaches zero beyond a certain point.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Hohenberg-Kohn theorem
  • Familiarity with Hamiltonians and quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of partial differential equations (PDEs)
  • Basic principles of linear algebra and uniqueness theorems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Hohenberg-Kohn theorems in detail
  • Explore the implications of Hamiltonians in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about uniqueness theorems in the context of partial differential equations
  • Investigate the effects of potential changes on wave functions in quantum systems
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, researchers in theoretical physics, and students studying quantum mechanics who seek to deepen their understanding of the Hohenberg-Kohn theorem and its implications for ground state uniqueness.

TeethWhitener
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
2,630
Reaction score
2,244
Hi everyone, I was going through the derivation of the first Hohenberg-Kohn theorem (see here under eqn 1.31 for reference) when I noticed a once-obvious statement that didn't seem so obvious anymore. Namely, the proof requires that if you have two Hamiltonians ##H_1 \neq H_2##, then their ground states are not equal ##\Psi_1 \neq \Psi_2##. Maybe this statement is just completely obvious and I'm missing some PDE or linear algebra uniqueness theorem that I should have remembered from college, but for the life of me, I can't prove it. I know that 2nd order ODE's have unique solutions (given the proper assumptions), but why can't we have:
$$H_1\Psi = E_1\Psi$$
$$H_2\Psi = E_2\Psi$$
where ##H_i## is a partial differential operator?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nevermind, I think I figured it out. Let:
$$H_1 = -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\nabla^2+V_1(\mathbf{r})$$
$$H_2 = -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\nabla^2+V_2(\mathbf{r})$$
Then subtracting ##(H_2-E_2)\Psi=0## from ##(H_1-E_1)\Psi=0## gives
$$V_1(\mathbf{r})-V_2(\mathbf{r}) = E_1-E_2$$
So the potentials are only allowed to differ by a constant.
 
Note that here it's assumed that ##\Psi \neq 0##. If you have a potential like ##V(x) = \frac{1}{2}kx^2## for some dimensionless position coordinate ##x## (with the unit of ##x## being same order of magnitude as the std. dev. of the ground state probability distribution) and then change it to something like

##V(x) = \left\{\begin{smallmatrix}\frac{1}{2}kx^2 ,\hspace{20pt}x<1000\\ 10kx^2 ,\hspace{20pt}x\geq 1000\end{smallmatrix}\right.##

the change doesn't really affect the ground state, as the wave function will be practically zero for values of ##x## larger than 1000 anyway.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
30K
  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
8K