Help with McMahon's Relativity

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mikah
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relativity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on advanced concepts in differential geometry, specifically regarding McMahon's Relativity. Key topics include the conversion of the Lambda tensor metric between local non-holonomic and global holonomic bases, the rationale behind using partial differential operators as components of tangent vectors, and the calculation of Cartan coordinate-free geodesic acceleration in flat spaces. The discussion emphasizes the importance of context when asking questions about complex topics, as well as the need for clarity in mathematical expressions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential geometry concepts, particularly geodesics and tangent vectors.
  • Familiarity with the Lambda tensor metric and its applications in relativity.
  • Knowledge of the Cartan formalism and coordinate-free methods in geometry.
  • Proficiency in calculus, specifically in dealing with derivatives and the chain rule.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the conversion techniques for Lambda tensor metrics in both local and global contexts.
  • Explore the implications of using partial differential operators as tangent vector components in differential geometry.
  • Research the Cartan coordinate-free approach to geodesic calculations and its applications in flat spaces.
  • Examine the role of the Lie bracket in differential geometry and its significance in geodesic acceleration.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for graduate students in mathematics or physics, researchers in differential geometry, and anyone studying advanced topics in relativity and geometric analysis.

mikah
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Please help a newbie? I am having trouble with the following:
1) Lamda tensor metric conversion between local non-holonomic basis and global holonomic basis, how can you just "read off" the diagonal from the line element say in spherical coordinates and when do you choose the inverse metric (just take the inverse of each component of the diagonal?) when converting with either one-forms or vectors? pp 100 to 103.

2) Why did they choose to make the components of the tangent vector the partial diff operator making the vector an operator?

3) When calculating the Cartan coordinate free geodesic acceleration between two geodesics when the Lie bracket is zero (flat) how do you get the second total derivative with respect to tau as the product of tangent vector grad (tangent vector grad displacement vector). Do you take double Lie derivative on operators? pp 135

Thank you in advance. Mikah
 
Physics news on Phys.org
More people will be able to help you if you put your questions in context; for example, quoting the relevant part of the text. Otherwise, you may be waiting a while for someone with that book to come along.
 
mikah said:
2) Why did they choose to make the components of the tangent vector the partial diff operator making the vector an operator?
Think about how to calculate the rate of change of a function [itex]f:\mathbb R^n\rightarrow\mathbb R[/itex] along a curve in [itex]\mathbb R^n[/itex]. Suppose that [itex]C:(a,b)\rightarrow\mathbb R^n[/itex]. Then the rate of change of f at C(t) is [itex](f\circ C)'(t)[/itex]. The chain rule now tells us that

[tex](f\circ C)'(t)=f,_\mu(C(t)) C'^\mu(t)=C^\mu'(t) D_\mu|_{C(t)} f[/tex]

Note that [itex]C^\mu'(t)[/itex] are the components of the tangent vector of the curve.

Now suppose that [itex]C:(a,b)\rightarrow M[/itex] and [itex]f:M\rightarrow\mathbb R[/itex]. The rate of change of f at C(t) is still [itex](f\circ C)'(t)[/itex], but now the first equality above doesn't make sense as it stands. We can however make sense of it using a coordinate system x:

[tex](f\circ C)'(t)=(f\circ x^{-1}\circ x\circ C)=(x\circ C)^\mu'(t)\frac{\partial}{\partial x^\mu}\bigg|_{C(t)}f[/tex]

Note the similarities between this and the previous result. In both cases, the rate of change of f at C(t) came out equal to a linear combination of derivative operators acting on f, and in both cases the coefficients are equal to the components of a tangent vector of a curve in [itex]\mathbb R^n[/itex]. Also note that if we think of the identity map I (defined by I(x)=x for all x) on [itex]\mathbb R^n[/itex] as a coordinate system on [itex]\mathbb R^n[/itex], then we can put the first calculation into exactly the same form as the second (with I instead of x).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
7K