Help with new calculator selection (button choices)

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter xrayvision
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculator
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around selecting a new calculator, specifically comparing models with memory buttons (M buttons) and those with a 2nd button and a format button that utilizes Algebraic Operating System (AOS) for order of operations. Participants explore the utility of these features for basic calculations and record keeping.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses curiosity about the functionality of M buttons versus calculators with AOS, questioning if one type is more useful than the other for basic calculations.
  • Several participants advocate for Reverse Polish Notation (RPN), emphasizing its advantages and expressing strong preferences for it.
  • There is a discussion about the ambiguity in the phrasing of a mathematical expression, leading to different interpretations of how to perform calculations.
  • One participant shares their experience with a specific calculator model and its key presses for performing calculations, noting the ease of using parentheses keys.
  • Another participant mentions the availability of a free RPN calculator app and reflects on their positive experiences with RPN calculators during their education.
  • Concerns are raised about the necessity of advanced features for basic record keeping, with suggestions that simpler calculators may suffice.
  • Participants discuss specific models they are considering, including those with larger buttons and screens, and express preferences for features like memory keys and the ability to round decimals.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on which type of calculator is superior, as participants express differing opinions on the usefulness of memory buttons versus AOS functionality. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best choice for basic calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various calculator models and features, but there is uncertainty about the specific capabilities and limitations of each type. The discussion includes personal preferences and experiences that may not apply universally.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals seeking to purchase a calculator for basic mathematical tasks, those interested in RPN calculators, or anyone exploring the differences between various calculator functionalities.

xrayvision
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I need a new calculator. I always wondered what the M buttons on a calculator were for, and today I finally got around to Googling for it. Pretty cool.

While watching videos explaining various calculator buttons, I found that some calculators have a 2nd button and a format button where you can set it to AOS and it gives you the answer to the problem using the order of operations, so no M buttons needed. So, it seems to me that the latter type of calculator does what calculators with M buttons do, is that correct? Just wondering if one is more useful than the other when needing to do problems like the following: 6x3 - 2x7 + 15÷5 or 1000 ÷ 1.07 to the 4th power.

Not a very expensive life decision, but I want to make sure I get the best type of calculator. I don't do anything too complicated, just basic record keeping (usually). I've got two desktop calculators picked out, one with each type of set of buttons.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
RPN FOREVER!!!
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: gmax137, berkeman, jtbell and 2 others
Frabjous said:
RPN FOREVER!!!
I believe that would be "RPN !!! FOREVER".
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Frabjous
Vanadium 50 said:
I believe that would be "RPN !!! FOREVER".
After reading my OP, would you believe that I get that joke?
 
xrayvision said:
like the following: 6x3 - 2x7 + 15÷5
In RPN: 6 3 x 2 7 * - 15 + 5 ÷
xrayvision said:
1000 ÷ 1.07 to the 4th power.
The wording of this is ambiguous.
Do you mean this ...
$$\left( \frac {1000}{1.07}\right)^4$$
or this ...
$$\frac{1000}{1.07^4}$$
xrayvision said:
I don't do anything too complicated, just basic record keeping (usually).
If all you're doing is basic record keeping, you probably don't need anything much more complicated than what used to be called a "four banger," a calculator capable of doing addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division.
 
Mark44 said:
or this ...
The latter.

Mark44 said:
If all you're doing is basic record keeping, you probably don't need anything much more complicated than what used to be called a "four banger,"
Again, I'm also looking for one with either the memory keys or the 2nd button and a format button and wondering if one were more useful than another. I couldn't find any that had both and were also desktop models (big buttons, big screen).

Actually, I couldn't figure out how to do 1000 ÷ 1.07^4 with just memory buttons.
 
xrayvision said:
Actually, I couldn't figure out how to do 1000 ÷ 1.07^4 with just memory buttons.
Here are the key presses on my Casio fx 260.
1.07 ##x^y## 4 = ##X \to M## 1000 ÷ MR =
Result is 762.895212
On my calculator, to use the ##X \to M## button I have to first press the SHIFT key.

Calculators with memory buttons usually have a pair of keys for parentheses. On my calculator these are shown as [(--- and ---)].
The calculation above can be done like this:
1000 ÷ ( 1.07 ##x^y## 4 ) =
Result is the same as before.

xrayvision said:
Again, I'm also looking for one with either the memory keys or the 2nd button and a format button
You mentioned a format button in post #1 and something about AOS, but I don't know what AOS is short for. As mentioned by others, a different kind of calculator uses RPN (reverse Polish notation). The most prominent company that produces RPN calculators is HP (Hewlett Packard). These calculators typically have an Enter key but no = key. Possibly other calculators do calculations using RPN but I don't know of any and haven't bothered to search for them.
 
BTW, you shouldn't lose a lot of sleep agonizing over which calculator to buy. They are very inexpensive. This one goes for $9.49 on Amazon. This is the one I use most. Mine looks almost identical to this except the two blue keys in the picture are red on mine. I like this model because it's solar powered so you never have to change batteries (unless there's a small lithium battery inside -- I've never opened it up).
If all you do is record keeping, this might be overkill.
casio fx260.png
 
xrayvision said:
Not a very expensive life decision, but I want to make sure I get the best type of calculator.
Frabjous said:
RPN FOREVER!!!
Mark44 said:
They are very inexpensive.
Just a reminder that there is a free app for the HP-42 RPN calculator. I learned RPN back in undergrad ("Wait, where is the equal sign?!"), and have preferred it ever since.

The free software is available for phones and for personal computers:

https://thomasokken.com/free42/

:smile:

1713453596621.png
 
  • #10
Mark44 said:
Here are the key presses on my Casio fx 260.
1.07 ##x^y## 4 = ##X \to M## 1000 ÷ MR =
Result is 762.895212
On my calculator, to use the ##X \to M## button I have to first press the SHIFT key.
I'm already lost. :)
Mark44 said:
Calculators with memory buttons usually have a pair of keys for parentheses. On my calculator these are shown as [(--- and ---)].
The calculation above can be done like this:
1000 ÷ ( 1.07 xy 4 ) =
Result is the same as before.
Now that's more my speed! So, for these kind of problems, the M keys are redundant? I like the ease of the parentheses keys.
Mark44 said:
You mentioned a format button in post #1 and something about AOS, but I don't know what AOS is short for.
I was following a YouTube video titled "Learn to use the financial calculator in under 7 minutes!" The guy in the video uses a Texas Instruments BA II Plus Financial Calculator. AOS is short for Algebraic Operating System. With the 2nd button and the format button you can change it from solving in a chain to the order of operations.
Mark44 said:
BTW, you shouldn't lose a lot of sleep agonizing over which calculator to buy.
I'm not. I actually have a couple of scientific calculators, but I wanted a desktop model with bigger buttons and bigger screen. I was considering the Sharp VX2128V and the Casio DJ-120DPLUS-W-EP (I like the switches where you can choose how many decimals to round to) but now I might look for a model with parentheses. I also like the Sharp EL-1901 Paperless Printing Calculator so I can check my inputs for mistakes.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
14K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
39K